linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 03/12] staging: wilc1000: simplify vif[i]->ndev accesses

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170831154239.058027538@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 31 Aug 2017 17:44:08 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 03/12] staging: wilc1000: simplify vif[i]->ndev accesses

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>

commit 735bb39ca3bed8469b3b3a42d8cc57bdb9fc4dd7 upstream.

With gcc-7, I got a new warning for this driver:

wilc1000/linux_wlan.c: In function 'wilc_netdev_cleanup':
wilc1000/linux_wlan.c:1224:15: error: 'vif[1]' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
wilc1000/linux_wlan.c:1224:15: error: 'vif[0]' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]

A closer look at the function reveals that it's more complex than
it needs to be, given that based on how the device is created
we always get

	netdev_priv(vif->ndev) == vif

Based on this assumption, I found a few other places in the same file
that can be simplified. That code appears to be a relic from times
when the assumption above was not valid.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/staging/wilc1000/linux_wlan.c |   34 +++++++++-------------------------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/linux_wlan.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/linux_wlan.c
@@ -269,23 +269,12 @@ static struct net_device *get_if_handler
 
 int wilc_wlan_set_bssid(struct net_device *wilc_netdev, u8 *bssid, u8 mode)
 {
-	int i = 0;
-	int ret = -1;
-	struct wilc_vif *vif;
-	struct wilc *wilc;
-
-	vif = netdev_priv(wilc_netdev);
-	wilc = vif->wilc;
+	struct wilc_vif *vif = netdev_priv(wilc_netdev);
 
-	for (i = 0; i < wilc->vif_num; i++)
-		if (wilc->vif[i]->ndev == wilc_netdev) {
-			memcpy(wilc->vif[i]->bssid, bssid, 6);
-			wilc->vif[i]->mode = mode;
-			ret = 0;
-			break;
-		}
+	memcpy(vif->bssid, bssid, 6);
+	vif->mode = mode;
 
-	return ret;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 int wilc_wlan_get_num_conn_ifcs(struct wilc *wilc)
@@ -1212,16 +1201,11 @@ void WILC_WFI_mgmt_rx(struct wilc *wilc,
 
 void wilc_netdev_cleanup(struct wilc *wilc)
 {
-	int i = 0;
-	struct wilc_vif *vif[NUM_CONCURRENT_IFC];
+	int i;
 
-	if (wilc && (wilc->vif[0]->ndev || wilc->vif[1]->ndev)) {
+	if (wilc && (wilc->vif[0]->ndev || wilc->vif[1]->ndev))
 		unregister_inetaddr_notifier(&g_dev_notifier);
 
-		for (i = 0; i < NUM_CONCURRENT_IFC; i++)
-			vif[i] = netdev_priv(wilc->vif[i]->ndev);
-	}
-
 	if (wilc && wilc->firmware) {
 		release_firmware(wilc->firmware);
 		wilc->firmware = NULL;
@@ -1230,7 +1214,7 @@ void wilc_netdev_cleanup(struct wilc *wi
 	if (wilc && (wilc->vif[0]->ndev || wilc->vif[1]->ndev)) {
 		for (i = 0; i < NUM_CONCURRENT_IFC; i++)
 			if (wilc->vif[i]->ndev)
-				if (vif[i]->mac_opened)
+				if (wilc->vif[i]->mac_opened)
 					wilc_mac_close(wilc->vif[i]->ndev);
 
 		for (i = 0; i < NUM_CONCURRENT_IFC; i++) {
@@ -1278,9 +1262,9 @@ int wilc_netdev_init(struct wilc **wilc,
 
 		vif->idx = wl->vif_num;
 		vif->wilc = *wilc;
+		vif->ndev = ndev;
 		wl->vif[i] = vif;
-		wl->vif[wl->vif_num]->ndev = ndev;
-		wl->vif_num++;
+		wl->vif_num = i;
 		ndev->netdev_ops = &wilc_netdev_ops;
 
 		{