[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1504197268.3799.8.camel@synopsys.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 16:34:29 +0000
From: Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>
To: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arc: Flush and invalidate caches on start
Hi Vineet,
On Thu, 2017-08-31 at 09:31 -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On 08/31/2017 07:22 AM, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> >
> > This is useful to make sure no stale data exists in caches after bootloaders.
> > The worst thing could be some lines of cache were locked in a bootloader
> > for example during DDR recalibration and never unlocked. This may lead
> > to really unpredictable issues later down the line.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@...opsys.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arc/kernel/head.S | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arc/kernel/head.S b/arch/arc/kernel/head.S
> > index 8b90d25a15cc..04e28b664183 100644
> > --- a/arch/arc/kernel/head.S
> > +++ b/arch/arc/kernel/head.S
> > @@ -34,6 +34,10 @@
> > #endif
> > sr r5, [ARC_REG_IC_CTRL]
> >
> > + ; Invalidate entire I$
> > + mov r5, 1
> > + sr r5, [ARC_REG_IC_IVIC]
> > +
> > 1:
> > lr r5, [ARC_REG_DC_BCR]
> > breq r5, 0, 1f ; D$ doesn't exist
> > @@ -46,6 +50,18 @@
> > #endif
> > sr r5, [ARC_REG_DC_CTRL]
> >
> > + ; Flush entire D$
> > + mov r5, 1
> > + sr r5, [ARC_REG_DC_FLSH]
> > + ; Wait for flush operation to complete
> > +1:
> > + lr r5, [ARC_REG_DC_CTRL]
> > + bbit1 r5, DC_CTRL_FLUSH_STATUS, 1b
> > +
> > + ; Invalidate entire D$
> > + mov r5, 1
> > + sr r5, [ARC_REG_DC_IVDC]
> > +
>
> AFAIK uboot already flushes the caches before handing control over to kernel - so
> why do we need it here.
> If uboot is locking lines, it needs to fix that and not penalize the general case
> with or w/o uboot !
U-Boot indeed flushes caches.. but doesn't invalidate them!
And only invalidation unlocks locked lines.
That indeed should be added in U-Boot but I'd say above stuff doesn't
influence a lot code size or execution time while makes system more fool-proof.
-Alexey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists