[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170831200155.mvu7go7n2z3eijnj@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 22:01:55 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, devel@...uxdriverproject.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Jork Loeser <Jork.Loeser@...rosoft.com>,
Simon Xiao <sixiao@...rosoft.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/9] Hyper-V: paravirtualized remote TLB flushing and
hypercall improvements
* Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> writes:
>
> > * Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> >> > Changes since v9:
> >> > - Rebase to 4.13-rc3.
> >> > - Drop PATCH1 as it was already taken by Greg to char-misc tree. There're no
> >> > functional dependencies on this patch so the series can go through a different tree
> >> > (and it actually belongs to x86 if I got Ingo's comment right).
> >> > - Add in missing void return type in PATCH1 [Colin King, Ingo Molnar, Greg KH]
> >> > - A few minor fixes in what is now PATCH7: add pr_fmt, tiny style fix in
> >> > hyperv_flush_tlb_others() [Andy Shevchenko]
> >> > - Fix "error: implicit declaration of function 'virt_to_phys'" in PATCH2
> >> > reported by kbuild test robot (#include <asm/io.h>)
> >> > - Add Steven's 'Reviewed-by:' to PATCH9.
> >>
> >> Ingo,
> >>
> >> this series ended up being 'almost merged' - you merged all but the last
> >> two patches to 'x86/platform' branch when Peter reported an issue with
> >> pagetable walkers. Now as we have 'x86/mm: Enable RCU based page table
> >> freeing (CONFIG_HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE=y)' merged to 'x86/mm' this is
> >> resolved and we can hopefully proceed with this series. Could you please
> >> let me know if I need to resend these last two patches or if you can
> >> take them from v10?
> >
> > Ok, I have merged tip:x86/mm into tip:x86/platform to pick up the dependency and
> > have applied patches #9 and #10.
>
> Hope you meant '#8 and #9' as v10 had only 9 patches :-)
Yes ;-)
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists