linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 01/12] housekeeping: Move housekeeping related code to its own file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1504210576.12821.6.camel@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 31 Aug 2017 16:16:16 -0400
From:   Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To:     Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>,
        Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
        Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/12] housekeeping: Move housekeeping related code
 to its own file

On Wed, 2017-08-23 at 03:51 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> The housekeeping code is currently tied to the nohz code. As we are
> planning to make housekeeping independant from it, start with moving
> the relevant code to its own file.
> 
Why are nohz full and housekeeping being
decoupled from each other?

Won't people want to use them together?

What use case am I missing?

-- 
All rights reversed
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)