[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4h=1seS9OS4KMk6EFYy1LzX2J7+qX_ocEfp4MVJ88q0qg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 14:41:16 -0700
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] nd_blk: Remove mmio_flush_range()
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 4:27 AM, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com> wrote:
> mmio_flush_range() suffers from a lack of clearly-defined semantics,
> and is somewhat ambiguous to port to other architectures where the
> scope of the writeback implied by "flush" and ordering might matter,
> but MMIO would tend to imply non-cacheable anyway. Per the rationale
> in 67a3e8fe9015 ("nd_blk: change aperture mapping from WC to WB"), the
> only existing use is actually to invalidate clean cache lines for
> ARCH_MEMREMAP_PMEM type mappings *without* writeback. Since the recent
> cleanup of the pmem API, that also now happens to be the exact purpose
> of arch_invalidate_pmem(), which would be a far more well-defined tool
> for the job.
>
> Rather than risk potentially inconsistent implementations of
> mmio_flush_range() for the sake of one callsite, streamline things by
> removing it entirely and instead move the ARCH_MEMREMAP_PMEM related
> definitions up to the libnvdimm level, so they can be shared by NFIT
> as well. This allows NFIT to be enabled for arm64.
>
Thanks, applied.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists