[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a12d7c91-92c7-9d01-b745-595357d836df@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2017 14:49:57 +0800
From: Quan Xu <quan.xu0@...il.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Yang Zhang <yang.zhang.wz@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
wanpeng.li@...mail.com, mst@...hat.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, rkrcmar@...hat.com, dmatlack@...gle.com,
agraf@...e.de, peterz@...radead.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Kyle Huey <me@...ehuey.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/7] sched/idle: Add poll before enter real idle
path
on 2017/8/29 22:39, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:46:37AM +0000, Yang Zhang wrote:
>> Add poll in do_idle. For UP VM, if there are running task, it will not
>> goes into idle path, so we only enable poll in SMP VM.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yang Zhang <yang.zhang.wz@...il.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Quan Xu <quan.xu0@...il.com>
>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
>> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
>> Cc: x86@...nel.org
>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
>> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
>> Cc: Kyle Huey <me@...ehuey.com>
>> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
>> Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
>> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 7 +++++++
>> kernel/sched/idle.c | 2 ++
>> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
>> index 3ca1980..def4113 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
>> @@ -332,6 +332,13 @@ void arch_cpu_idle(void)
>> x86_idle();
>> }
>>
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && defined(CONFIG_PARAVIRT)
>> +void arch_cpu_idle_poll(void)
>> +{
>> + paravirt_idle_poll();
>> +}
>> +#endif
> So this will get called on any system which has CONFIG_PARAVIRT enabled
> *even* if they're not running any guests.
>
> Huh?
Borislav ,
yes, this will get called on any system which has CONFIG_PARAVIRT
enabled.
but if they are not running any guests, the callback is
paravirt_nop() ,
IIUC which is as similar as the other paravirt_*, such as
paravirt_pgd_free()..
- Quan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists