linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/7] sched/idle: Add poll before enter real idle path

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 1 Sep 2017 14:49:57 +0800
From:   Quan Xu <quan.xu0@...il.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Yang Zhang <yang.zhang.wz@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        wanpeng.li@...mail.com, mst@...hat.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
        tglx@...utronix.de, rkrcmar@...hat.com, dmatlack@...gle.com,
        agraf@...e.de, peterz@...radead.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        Kyle Huey <me@...ehuey.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/7] sched/idle: Add poll before enter real idle
 path

on 2017/8/29 22:39, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:46:37AM +0000, Yang Zhang wrote:
>> Add poll in do_idle. For UP VM, if there are running task, it will not
>> goes into idle path, so we only enable poll in SMP VM.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yang Zhang <yang.zhang.wz@...il.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Quan Xu <quan.xu0@...il.com>
>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
>> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
>> Cc: x86@...nel.org
>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
>> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
>> Cc: Kyle Huey <me@...ehuey.com>
>> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
>> Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
>> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>> ---
>>   arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 7 +++++++
>>   kernel/sched/idle.c       | 2 ++
>>   2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
>> index 3ca1980..def4113 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
>> @@ -332,6 +332,13 @@ void arch_cpu_idle(void)
>>   	x86_idle();
>>   }
>>   
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && defined(CONFIG_PARAVIRT)
>> +void arch_cpu_idle_poll(void)
>> +{
>> +	paravirt_idle_poll();
>> +}
>> +#endif
> So this will get called on any system which has CONFIG_PARAVIRT enabled
> *even* if they're not running any guests.
>
> Huh?
    Borislav ,
    yes,  this will get called on any system which has CONFIG_PARAVIRT 
enabled.

    but if they are not running any guests,  the callback is 
paravirt_nop() ,
    IIUC which is as similar as the other paravirt_*, such as 
paravirt_pgd_free()..

  - Quan