lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <71a53bf8-3279-68db-3a95-b9e13c1fc73a@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Fri, 1 Sep 2017 11:36:24 +0200
From:   Andre Wild <wild@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Cc:     Christopher Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG: using __this_cpu_read() in preemptible [00000000] code:
 mm_percpu_wq/7

On 08/16/2017 04:20 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 11:13:07AM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
>> [ 5968.010352] WARNING: CPU: 54 PID: 7 at kernel/workqueue.c:2041 process_one_work+0x6d4/0x718
>>
>> (I don't remember we have seen the warning above in the first report) and then
>>
>> [ 5968.010913] Kernel panic - not syncing: preempt check
>> [ 5968.010919] CPU: 54 PID: 7 Comm: mm_percpu_wq Tainted: G        W       4.13.0-rc4-dirty #3
>> [ 5968.010923] Hardware name: IBM 3906 M03 703 (z/VM 6.4.0)
>> [ 5968.010927] Workqueue: mm_percpu_wq vmstat_update
>> [ 5968.010933] Call Trace:
>> [ 5968.010937] ([<0000000000113fbe>] show_stack+0x8e/0xe0)
>> [ 5968.010942]  [<0000000000a514be>] dump_stack+0x96/0xd8
>> [ 5968.010947]  [<000000000014302a>] panic+0x102/0x248
>> [ 5968.010952]  [<00000000007836d8>] check_preemption_disabled+0xf8/0x110
>> [ 5968.010956]  [<00000000002ee8e2>] refresh_cpu_vm_stats+0x1b2/0x400
>> [ 5968.010961]  [<00000000002ef8be>] vmstat_update+0x2e/0x98
>> [ 5968.010965]  [<0000000000166374>] process_one_work+0x3d4/0x718
>> [ 5968.010970]  [<000000000016708c>] rescuer_thread+0x214/0x390
>> [ 5968.010974]  [<000000000016edbc>] kthread+0x16c/0x180
>> [ 5968.010978]  [<0000000000a7273a>] kernel_thread_starter+0x6/0xc
>> [ 5968.010983]  [<0000000000a72734>] kernel_thread_starter+0x0/0xc
>>
>> On cpu 54 we have mm_percpu_wq with:
>>
>>      nr_cpus_allowed = 0x1,
>>      cpus_allowed = {
>> 	      bits = {0x4, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}
>>      },
>>
>> We also have CONFIG_NR_CPUS=256, so the above translates to cpu 3, which
>> obviously is not cpu 54 and explains the preempt check warning.
> 
> Looks like the same issue Paul was hitting.
> 
>   http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1501541603-4456-3-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
> 
> Can you see whether the above patch helps?
> 
> Thank.s
> 

Hello,

please excuse my late response. But I've found another kernel panic 
which stopped my test case execution each time. Now I've managed to work 
around the problem and it looks pretty good. With the patch I was not 
able to reproduce the problem within 24 hours runtime. Previously I 
could trigger it within 2-4 hours runtime.

Kind regards

André

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ