[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170901122454.zkrkr5b2pe7ajiuy@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2017 14:24:54 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched/idle: Use spin loop primitives for polling idle
On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 07:25:02PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/idle.c | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/idle.c b/kernel/sched/idle.c
> index 6c23e30c0e5c..b884980da8ef 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/idle.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/idle.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> #include <linux/stackprotector.h>
> #include <linux/suspend.h>
> #include <linux/livepatch.h>
> +#include <linux/processor.h>
>
> #include <asm/tlb.h>
>
> @@ -64,9 +65,13 @@ static noinline int __cpuidle cpu_idle_poll(void)
> trace_cpu_idle_rcuidle(0, smp_processor_id());
> local_irq_enable();
> stop_critical_timings();
> +
> + spin_begin();
> while (!tif_need_resched() &&
> (cpu_idle_force_poll || tick_check_broadcast_expired()))
> - cpu_relax();
> + spin_cpu_relax();
> + spin_end();
Do we want at least one tif_need_resched() check before we drop into low
prio mode?
> +
> start_critical_timings();
> trace_cpu_idle_rcuidle(PWR_EVENT_EXIT, smp_processor_id());
> rcu_idle_exit();
> --
> 2.13.3
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists