lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170901123856.p2trpebau57yxftc@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Fri, 1 Sep 2017 14:38:56 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
Cc:     mingo@...nel.org, tj@...nel.org, boqun.feng@...il.com,
        david@...morbit.com, johannes@...solutions.net, oleg@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] lockdep: Fix workqueue crossrelease annotation

On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 07:16:29PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:

> It would be gone _only_ at the time the history overrun, and then it
> will be built again. So, you are wrong.

How will it ever be build again? You only ever spawn the worker thread
_ONCE_, then it runs lots and lots of works.

We _could_ go fix it, but I really don't see it being worth the time and
effort, its a few isolated locks inside the kthread/workqueue code.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ