lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170901190822.4vmgl72qefp72s2j@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 1 Sep 2017 15:08:22 -0400
From:   Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>,
        Ulrich Obergfell <uobergfe@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 17/29] lockup_detector: Get rid of the thread
 teardown/setup dance

On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 09:16:15AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> The lockup detector reconfiguration tears down all watchdog threads when
> the watchdog is disabled and sets them up again when its enabled.
> 
> That's a pointless exercise. The watchdog threads are not consuming an
> insane amount of resources, so it's enough to set them up at init time and
> keep them in parked position when the watchdog is disabled and unpark them
> when it is reenabled. The smpboot thread infrastructure takes care of
> keeping the force parked threads in place even across cpu hotplug.

The original reasoning for implementing this complexity was we were worried
about catching kthread_[un]park errors.  It was thought in the rare case if
it failed, we would hang.  Perhaps we misunderstood the kthread_[un]park
code.

Cheers,
Don

> 
> Aside of that the code implements the park/unpark facility of smp hotplug
> threads on its own, which is even more pointless. We have functionality in
> the smpboot thread code to do so.
> 
> Use the new thread management functions and get rid of the unholy mess.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> ---
>  kernel/watchdog.c |  190 +++++-------------------------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 171 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/kernel/watchdog.c
> +++ b/kernel/watchdog.c
> @@ -92,13 +92,6 @@ struct cpumask watchdog_cpumask __read_m
>  unsigned long *watchdog_cpumask_bits = cpumask_bits(&watchdog_cpumask);
>  
>  /*
> - * The 'watchdog_running' variable is set to 1 when the watchdog threads
> - * are registered/started and is set to 0 when the watchdog threads are
> - * unregistered/stopped, so it is an indicator whether the threads exist.
> - */
> -static int __read_mostly watchdog_running;
> -
> -/*
>   * These functions can be overridden if an architecture implements its
>   * own hardlockup detector.
>   *
> @@ -123,10 +116,6 @@ void __weak watchdog_nmi_reconfigure(voi
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR
>  
> -/* Helper for online, unparked cpus. */
> -#define for_each_watchdog_cpu(cpu) \
> -	for_each_cpu_and((cpu), cpu_online_mask, &watchdog_cpumask)
> -
>  /* Global variables, exported for sysctl */
>  unsigned int __read_mostly softlockup_panic =
>  			CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_SOFTLOCKUP_PANIC_VALUE;
> @@ -252,11 +241,15 @@ void touch_all_softlockup_watchdogs(void
>  	int cpu;
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * this is done lockless
> -	 * do we care if a 0 races with a timestamp?
> -	 * all it means is the softlock check starts one cycle later
> +	 * watchdog_mutex cannpt be taken here, as this might be called
> +	 * from (soft)interrupt context, so the access to
> +	 * watchdog_allowed_cpumask might race with a concurrent update.
> +	 *
> +	 * The watchdog time stamp can race against a concurrent real
> +	 * update as well, the only side effect might be a cycle delay for
> +	 * the softlockup check.
>  	 */
> -	for_each_watchdog_cpu(cpu)
> +	for_each_cpu(cpu, &watchdog_allowed_mask)
>  		per_cpu(watchdog_touch_ts, cpu) = 0;
>  	wq_watchdog_touch(-1);
>  }
> @@ -296,9 +289,6 @@ static void watchdog_interrupt_count(voi
>  	__this_cpu_inc(hrtimer_interrupts);
>  }
>  
> -static int watchdog_enable_all_cpus(void);
> -static void watchdog_disable_all_cpus(void);
> -
>  /* watchdog kicker functions */
>  static enum hrtimer_restart watchdog_timer_fn(struct hrtimer *hrtimer)
>  {
> @@ -492,95 +482,6 @@ static struct smp_hotplug_thread watchdo
>  	.unpark			= watchdog_enable,
>  };
>  
> -/*
> - * park all watchdog threads that are specified in 'watchdog_cpumask'
> - *
> - * This function returns an error if kthread_park() of a watchdog thread
> - * fails. In this situation, the watchdog threads of some CPUs can already
> - * be parked and the watchdog threads of other CPUs can still be runnable.
> - * Callers are expected to handle this special condition as appropriate in
> - * their context.
> - *
> - * This function may only be called in a context that is protected against
> - * races with CPU hotplug - for example, via get_online_cpus().
> - */
> -static int watchdog_park_threads(void)
> -{
> -	int cpu, ret = 0;
> -
> -	for_each_watchdog_cpu(cpu) {
> -		ret = kthread_park(per_cpu(softlockup_watchdog, cpu));
> -		if (ret)
> -			break;
> -	}
> -	return ret;
> -}
> -
> -/*
> - * unpark all watchdog threads that are specified in 'watchdog_cpumask'
> - *
> - * This function may only be called in a context that is protected against
> - * races with CPU hotplug - for example, via get_online_cpus().
> - */
> -static void watchdog_unpark_threads(void)
> -{
> -	int cpu;
> -
> -	for_each_watchdog_cpu(cpu)
> -		kthread_unpark(per_cpu(softlockup_watchdog, cpu));
> -}
> -
> -static int update_watchdog_all_cpus(void)
> -{
> -	int ret;
> -
> -	ret = watchdog_park_threads();
> -	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> -
> -	watchdog_unpark_threads();
> -
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -
> -static int watchdog_enable_all_cpus(void)
> -{
> -	int err = 0;
> -
> -	if (!watchdog_running) {
> -		err = smpboot_register_percpu_thread_cpumask(&watchdog_threads,
> -							     &watchdog_cpumask);
> -		if (err)
> -			pr_err("Failed to create watchdog threads, disabled\n");
> -		else
> -			watchdog_running = 1;
> -	} else {
> -		/*
> -		 * Enable/disable the lockup detectors or
> -		 * change the sample period 'on the fly'.
> -		 */
> -		err = update_watchdog_all_cpus();
> -
> -		if (err) {
> -			watchdog_disable_all_cpus();
> -			pr_err("Failed to update lockup detectors, disabled\n");
> -		}
> -	}
> -
> -	if (err)
> -		watchdog_enabled = 0;
> -
> -	return err;
> -}
> -
> -static void watchdog_disable_all_cpus(void)
> -{
> -	if (watchdog_running) {
> -		watchdog_running = 0;
> -		smpboot_unregister_percpu_thread(&watchdog_threads);
> -	}
> -}
> -
>  static void softlockup_update_smpboot_threads(void)
>  {
>  	lockdep_assert_held(&watchdog_mutex);
> @@ -655,7 +556,6 @@ static inline int watchdog_park_threads(
>  static inline void watchdog_unpark_threads(void) { }
>  static inline int watchdog_enable_all_cpus(void) { return 0; }
>  static inline void watchdog_disable_all_cpus(void) { }
> -static inline void set_sample_period(void) { }
>  static inline void softlockup_init_threads(void) { }
>  static inline void softlockup_update_threads(void) { }
>  static inline void softlockup_reconfigure_threads(bool enabled) { }
> @@ -695,28 +595,10 @@ void lockup_detector_soft_poweroff(void)
>  /*
>   * Update the run state of the lockup detectors.
>   */
> -static int proc_watchdog_update(void)
> +static void proc_watchdog_update(void)
>  {
> -	int err = 0;
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * Watchdog threads won't be started if they are already active.
> -	 * The 'watchdog_running' variable in watchdog_*_all_cpus() takes
> -	 * care of this. If those threads are already active, the sample
> -	 * period will be updated and the lockup detectors will be enabled
> -	 * or disabled 'on the fly'.
> -	 */
> -	if (watchdog_enabled && watchdog_thresh)
> -		err = watchdog_enable_all_cpus();
> -	else
> -		watchdog_disable_all_cpus();
> -
> +	softlockup_reconfigure_threads(watchdog_enabled && watchdog_thresh);
>  	watchdog_nmi_reconfigure();
> -
> -	__lockup_detector_cleanup();
> -
> -	return err;
> -
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -772,17 +654,8 @@ static int proc_watchdog_common(int whic
>  				new = old & ~which;
>  		} while (cmpxchg(&watchdog_enabled, old, new) != old);
>  
> -		/*
> -		 * Update the run state of the lockup detectors. There is _no_
> -		 * need to check the value returned by proc_watchdog_update()
> -		 * and to restore the previous value of 'watchdog_enabled' as
> -		 * both lockup detectors are disabled if proc_watchdog_update()
> -		 * returns an error.
> -		 */
> -		if (old == new)
> -			goto out;
> -
> -		err = proc_watchdog_update();
> +		if (old != new)
> +			proc_watchdog_update();
>  	}
>  out:
>  	mutex_unlock(&watchdog_mutex);
> @@ -826,50 +699,28 @@ int proc_soft_watchdog(struct ctl_table
>  int proc_watchdog_thresh(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
>  			 void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
>  {
> -	int err, old, new;
> +	int err, old;
>  
>  	cpu_hotplug_disable();
>  	mutex_lock(&watchdog_mutex);
>  
> -	old = ACCESS_ONCE(watchdog_thresh);
> +	old = READ_ONCE(watchdog_thresh);
>  	err = proc_dointvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
>  
> -	if (err || !write)
> -		goto out;
> +	if (!err && write && old != READ_ONCE(watchdog_thresh))
> +		proc_watchdog_update();
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * Update the sample period. Restore on failure.
> -	 */
> -	new = ACCESS_ONCE(watchdog_thresh);
> -	if (old == new)
> -		goto out;
> -
> -	set_sample_period();
> -	err = proc_watchdog_update();
> -	if (err) {
> -		watchdog_thresh = old;
> -		set_sample_period();
> -	}
> -out:
>  	mutex_unlock(&watchdog_mutex);
>  	cpu_hotplug_enable();
>  	return err;
>  }
>  
> -static void watchdog_update_cpus(void)
> -{
> -	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR) && watchdog_running) {
> -		smpboot_update_cpumask_percpu_thread(&watchdog_threads,
> -						     &watchdog_cpumask);
> -		__lockup_detector_cleanup();
> -	}
> -}
> -
>  static void proc_watchdog_cpumask_update(void)
>  {
>  	/* Remove impossible cpus to keep sysctl output clean. */
>  	cpumask_and(&watchdog_cpumask, &watchdog_cpumask, cpu_possible_mask);
> -	watchdog_update_cpus();
> +
> +	softlockup_update_threads();
>  	watchdog_nmi_reconfigure();
>  }
>  
> @@ -899,8 +750,6 @@ int proc_watchdog_cpumask(struct ctl_tab
>  
>  void __init lockup_detector_init(void)
>  {
> -	set_sample_period();
> -
>  #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
>  	if (tick_nohz_full_enabled()) {
>  		pr_info("Disabling watchdog on nohz_full cores by default\n");
> @@ -911,6 +760,5 @@ void __init lockup_detector_init(void)
>  	cpumask_copy(&watchdog_cpumask, cpu_possible_mask);
>  #endif
>  
> -	if (watchdog_enabled)
> -		watchdog_enable_all_cpus();
> +	softlockup_init_threads();
>  }
> 
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ