[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170901140123.56c5abb2@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2017 14:01:23 +1000
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] start using spin primitives in sched and locking
Hi guys,
Any thoughts on these?
Thanks,
Nick
On Sun, 20 Aug 2017 19:25:00 +1000
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com> wrote:
> Nicholas Piggin (2):
> locking: Use spin primitives for busy loops
> sched/idle: Use spin loop primitives for polling idle
>
> include/linux/bit_spinlock.h | 5 ++---
> include/linux/seqlock.h | 9 ++++-----
> kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h | 6 ++----
> kernel/locking/mutex.c | 10 ++++++++--
> kernel/locking/osq_lock.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
> kernel/locking/qrwlock.c | 11 ++++++++---
> kernel/locking/qspinlock.c | 14 ++++++++++----
> kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h | 16 ++++++++++++----
> kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c | 9 +++++++--
> kernel/sched/idle.c | 7 ++++++-
> 10 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists