[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170901050234.GA2361@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2017 07:02:34 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuahkh@....samsung.com,
patches@...nelci.org, ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.18 00/24] 3.18.69-stable review
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 07:30:37PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 05:43:36PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.18.69 release.
> > There are 24 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Sat Sep 2 15:40:49 UTC 2017.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
>
> Test results are for v3.18.68-24-gf3691a3.
>
> Build results:
> total: 136 pass: 136 fail: 0
> Qemu test results:
> total: 111 pass: 111 fail: 0
>
> Details are available at http://kerneltests.org/builders.
Thanks, yeah, I messed up and pushed the trees out with a broken f2fs
patch that I hadn't even committed locally :(
All should be good now, as your reports show, thanks for testing them
all and letting me know.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists