[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1504372784.19040.1.camel@ranerica-desktop>
Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2017 10:19:44 -0700
From: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Chen Yucong <slaoub@...il.com>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, Adam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@...il.com>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>,
Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@...el.com>,
Nathan Howard <liverlint@...il.com>,
Adan Hawthorn <adanhawthorn@...il.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 06/28] x86/mpx: Do not use SIB.index if its value is
100b and ModRM.mod is not 11b
On Thu, 2017-08-31 at 21:38 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 05:27:47PM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> > Section 2.2.1.2 of the Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software
> > Developer's Manual volume 2A states that when ModRM.mod !=11b and
> > ModRM.rm = 100b indexed register-indirect addressing is used. In other
> > words, a SIB byte follows the ModRM byte. In the specific case of
> > SIB.index = 100b, the scale*index portion of the computation of the
> > effective address is null. To signal callers of this particular situation,
> > get_reg_offset() can return -EDOM (-EINVAL continues to indicate that an
> > error when decoding the SIB byte).
> >
> > An example of this situation can be the following instruction:
> >
> > 8b 4c 23 80 mov -0x80(%rbx,%riz,1),%rcx
> > ModRM: 0x4c [mod:1b][reg:1b][rm:100b]
> > SIB: 0x23 [scale:0b][index:100b][base:11b]
> > Displacement: 0x80 (1-byte, as per ModRM.mod = 1b)
> >
> > The %riz 'register' indicates a null index.
> >
> > In long mode, a REX prefix may be used. When a REX prefix is present,
> > REX.X adds a fourth bit to the register selection of SIB.index. This gives
> > the ability to refer to all the 16 general purpose registers. When REX.X is
> > 1b and SIB.index is 100b, the index is indicated in %r12. In our example,
> > this would look like:
> >
> > 42 8b 4c 23 80 mov -0x80(%rbx,%r12,1),%rcx
> > REX: 0x42 [W:0b][R:0b][X:1b][B:0b]
> > ModRM: 0x4c [mod:1b][reg:1b][rm:100b]
> > SIB: 0x23 [scale:0b][.X: 1b, index:100b][.B:0b, base:11b]
> > Displacement: 0x80 (1-byte, as per ModRM.mod = 1b)
> >
> > %r12 is a valid register to use in the scale*index part of the effective
> > address computation.
> >
> > Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
> > Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Adam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@...il.com>
> > Cc: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> > Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>
> > Cc: Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@...el.com>
> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> > Cc: Nathan Howard <liverlint@...il.com>
> > Cc: Adan Hawthorn <adanhawthorn@...il.com>
> > Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
> > Cc: Ravi V. Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>
> > Cc: x86@...nel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/mm/mpx.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Thanks for your review!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists