[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170904074355.niloziky42aki7bg@flea>
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2017 09:43:55 +0200
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To: Stefan Brüns <stefan.bruens@...h-aachen.de>
Cc: linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Code Kipper <codekipper@...il.com>,
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] dmaengine: sun6i: Move number of
pchans/vchans/request to device struct
On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 12:40:56AM +0200, Stefan Brüns wrote:
> Preparatory patch: If the same compatible is used for different SoCs which
> have a common register layout, but different number of channels, the
> channel count can no longer be stored in the config. Store it in the
> device structure instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Brüns <stefan.bruens@...h-aachen.de>
As stated already, we already are going to have a different
compatible, and this is not something that will change from one
instance to the other. Having code is therefore:
A) Making the code more complex
B) For no particular reason.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (802 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists