[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19156a13-6153-f570-317b-7b80505347e7@lge.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2017 10:35:00 +0900
From: Kyeongdon Kim <kyeongdon.kim@....com>
To: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Cc: ying.huang@...el.com, vbabka@...e.cz, hannes@...xchg.org,
xieyisheng1@...wei.com, luto@...nel.org, shli@...com,
mhocko@...e.com, mgorman@...hsingularity.net,
hillf.zj@...baba-inc.com, kemi.wang@...el.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
bigeasy@...utronix.de, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, bongkyu.kim@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] mm/vmstats: add counters for the page frag cache
Thanks for your reply,
But I couldn't find "NR_FRAGMENT_PAGES" in linux-next.git .. is that
vmstat counter? or others?
As you know, page_frag_alloc() directly calls __alloc_pages_nodemask()
function,
so that makes too difficult to see memory usage in real time even though
we have "/meminfo or /slabinfo.." information.
If there was a way already to figure out the memory leakage from
page_frag_cache in mainline, I agree your opinion
but I think we don't have it now.
If those counters too much in my patch,
I can say two values (pgfrag_alloc and pgfrag_free) are enough to guess
what will happen
and would remove pgfrag_alloc_calls and pgfrag_free_calls.
Thanks,
Kyeongdon Kim
On 2017-09-01 오후 6:12, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> IMHO that's too much counters.
> Per-node NR_FRAGMENT_PAGES should be enough for guessing what's going on.
> Perf probes provides enough features for furhter debugging.
>
> On 01.09.2017 02:37, Kyeongdon Kim wrote:
> > There was a memory leak problem when we did stressful test
> > on Android device.
> > The root cause of this was from page_frag_cache alloc
> > and it was very hard to find out.
> >
> > We add to count the page frag allocation and free with function call.
> > The gap between pgfrag_alloc and pgfrag_free is good to to calculate
> > for the amount of page.
> > The gap between pgfrag_alloc_calls and pgfrag_free_calls is for
> > sub-indicator.
> > They can see trends of memory usage during the test.
> > Without it, it's difficult to check page frag usage so I believe we
> > should add it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kyeongdon Kim <kyeongdon.kim@....com>
> > ---
Powered by blists - more mailing lists