linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][pinctrl-next] pinctrl: sprd: make three local functions static

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 4 Sep 2017 18:57:36 +0800
From:   Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
To:     Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...eadtrum.com>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][pinctrl-next] pinctrl: sprd: make three local functions static

Hi,

On 4 September 2017 at 18:53, Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com> wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> The functions sprd_pmx_get_function_count, sprd_pmx_get_function_name
> and sprd_pmx_get_function_groups are local to the source and do not
> need to be in global scope, so make them static.
>
> Cleans up sparse warnings:
> "symbol 'sprd_pmx_get_function_count' was not declared. Should it be
> static?"
> "symbol 'sprd_pmx_get_function_name' was not declared. Should it be
> static?"
> "symbol 'sprd_pmx_get_function_groups' was not declared. Should it be
> static?"
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>

Ah, I missed these functions, thanks for fixing this issue.

> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.c | 14 +++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.c b/drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.c
> index 7e7b9ac7e836..c178b4a6d7f5 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.c
> @@ -353,13 +353,13 @@ static const struct pinctrl_ops sprd_pctrl_ops = {
>         .dt_free_map = pinctrl_utils_free_map,
>  };
>
> -int sprd_pmx_get_function_count(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev)
> +static int sprd_pmx_get_function_count(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev)
>  {
>         return PIN_FUNC_MAX;
>  }
>
> -const char *sprd_pmx_get_function_name(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> -                                      unsigned int selector)
> +static const char *sprd_pmx_get_function_name(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> +                                             unsigned int selector)
>  {
>         switch (selector) {
>         case PIN_FUNC_1:
> @@ -375,10 +375,10 @@ const char *sprd_pmx_get_function_name(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
>         }
>  }
>
> -int sprd_pmx_get_function_groups(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> -                                unsigned int selector,
> -                                const char * const **groups,
> -                                unsigned int * const num_groups)
> +static int sprd_pmx_get_function_groups(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> +                                       unsigned int selector,
> +                                       const char * const **groups,
> +                                       unsigned int * const num_groups)
>  {
>         struct sprd_pinctrl *pctl = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
>         struct sprd_pinctrl_soc_info *info = pctl->info;
> --
> 2.14.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



-- 
Baolin.wang
Best Regards