[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170904121050.dsqbh3efmkteu3qj@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2017 14:10:50 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Ulrich Obergfell <uobergfe@...hat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 11/29] lockup_detector: Remove park_in_progress hackery
On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 01:09:06PM +0200, Ulrich Obergfell wrote:
> - A thread hogs CPU N (soft lockup) so that watchdog/N is unable to run.
> - A user re-configures 'watchdog_thresh' on the fly. The reconfiguration
> requires parking/unparking of all watchdog threads.
This is where you fail, its silly to require parking for
reconfiguration.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists