[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNASLh4vYqZhM9g2AL1uUtieviAmmWOp_Mzoj0zG=Ejz0cA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2017 21:55:39 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To: Keiji Hayashibara <hayashibara.keiji@...ionext.com>
Cc: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu@...aro.org>,
Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>,
Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>,
Kiyoshi Owada <owada.kiyoshi@...ionext.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] dt-bindings: nvmem: add description for UniPhier eFuse
2017-09-01 8:20 GMT+09:00 Keiji Hayashibara <hayashibara.keiji@...ionext.com>:
> Add uniphier-efuse dt-bindings documentation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Keiji Hayashibara <hayashibara.keiji@...ionext.com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/nvmem/uniphier-efuse.txt | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/uniphier-efuse.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/uniphier-efuse.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/uniphier-efuse.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..09024a2
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/uniphier-efuse.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
> += UniPhier eFuse device tree bindings =
> +
> +This UniPhier eFuse must be under soc-glue.
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible: should be "socionext,uniphier-efuse"
> +- reg: should contain the register base and length
> +
> += Data cells =
> +Are child nodes of efuse, bindings of which as described in
> +bindings/nvmem/nvmem.txt
> +
> +Example:
> +
> + soc-glue@...00000 {
> + compatible = "socionext,uniphier-ld20-soc-glue-debug",
> + "simple-mfd";
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <1>;
> + ranges = <0x0 0x5f900000 0x2000>;
IMHO, I think an empty "ranges;" will clarify the code,
but it is up to your taste.
> +
> + efuse {
> + compatible = "socionext,uniphier-efuse",
> + "syscon";
You are adding a dedicated driver for "socionext,uniphier-efuse".
Then, "syscon" as well?
> + reg = <0x100 0xf00>;
Not so many efuse registers exist on the SoC.
reg = <0x100 0x200>; will be enough.
Or if you want to be strict to the hw spec, you can write as follows:
soc-glue@...00000 {
compatible = "socionext,uniphier-ld20-soc-glue-debug";
"simple-mfd";
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <1>;
ranges = <0x0 0x5f900000 0x2000>;
efuse@100 {
compatible = "socionext,uniphier-efuse";
reg = <0x100 0x28>;
};
efuse@200 {
compatible = "socionext,uniphier-efuse";
reg = <0x200 0x68>;
};
};
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <1>;
> +
> + /* Data cells */
> + usb_mon: usb_mon {
> + reg = <0x154 0xc>;
> + };
This <0x154 0xc> represents 0x5f900254 in CPU address view.
(0x5f900000 + 0x100 + 0x154)
So many ranges conversion, and how error-prone..
> + };
> +
> += Data consumers =
> +Are device nodes which consume nvmem data cells.
> +
> +Example:
> +
> + usb {
> + ...
> + nvmem-cells = <&usb_mon>;
> + nvmem-cell-names = "usb_mon";
> + }
> --
> 2.7.4
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists