[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51391c6f-2c20-119e-f8d4-cc4800c79124@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2017 14:37:14 +0100
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
ALKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Roy Franz <roy.franz@...ium.com>,
Harb Abdulhamid <harba@...eaurora.org>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Loc Ho <lho@....com>, Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@....com>,
Ryan Harkin <Ryan.Harkin@....com>,
Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 15/18] clk: add support for clocks provided by SCMI
On 01/09/17 01:19, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 08/04, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-scmi.c b/drivers/clk/clk-scmi.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..37f98a6439a0
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-scmi.c
[...]
>> +static int scmi_clocks_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
>> + const struct scmi_handle *handle = devm_scmi_handle_get(dev);
>> +
>> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(handle) || !handle->clk_ops)
>> + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>> +
>> + return scmi_clk_add(dev, np, handle);
>
> Why the function? We support more than just platform devices?
> Just fold scmi_clk_add() into this function instead please.
>
All valid points. Fixed locally now, will post as part of next posting
of the series.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
Powered by blists - more mailing lists