[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cef46365-5695-ee20-c2cf-12cad823d179@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2017 08:35:28 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...eadtrum.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH -next] pinctrl: sprd: fix build errors and dependencies
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Fix build errors when CONFIG_OF is not enabled.
Also, the pinctrl-sprd-sc9860 driver uses functions from the pinctrl-sprd
driver, so the former should depend on the latter driver.
../drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.c: In function 'sprd_dt_node_to_map':
../drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.c:290:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'pinconf_generic_parse_dt_config' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
ret = pinconf_generic_parse_dt_config(np, pctldev, &configs,
^
../drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.c: At top level:
../drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.c:844:44: error: array type has incomplete element type
static const struct pinconf_generic_params sprd_dt_params[] = {
^
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...eadtrum.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
---
drivers/pinctrl/sprd/Kconfig | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
Why are these drivers not buildable as loadable modules?
I.e., why bool instead of tristate?
--- linux-next-20170904.orig/drivers/pinctrl/sprd/Kconfig
+++ linux-next-20170904/drivers/pinctrl/sprd/Kconfig
@@ -8,10 +8,12 @@ config PINCTRL_SPRD
select PINCONF
select GENERIC_PINCONF
select GENERIC_PINMUX_FUNCTIONS
+ depends on OF
help
Say Y here to enable Spreadtrum pinctrl driver
config PINCTRL_SPRD_SC9860
bool "Spreadtrum SC9860 pinctrl driver"
+ depends on PINCTRL_SPRD
help
Say Y here to enable Spreadtrum SC9860 pinctrl driver
Powered by blists - more mailing lists