linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][next] Thermal: int3406_thermal: fix unused variable warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1504496201.2762.2.camel@intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 04 Sep 2017 11:36:41 +0800
From:   Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
To:     Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] Thermal: int3406_thermal: fix unused variable
 warning

On Fri, 2017-09-01 at 10:58 +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> 
> The variable index was introduced by an earlier commit and is not
> used, and hence should be removed.
> 
> Cleans up warning: "unused variable 'index'"
> 
> Fixes: c658894562ba ("Thermal: int3406_thermal: fix thermal sysfs
> I/F")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>

thanks, I will fold this cleanup into the previous commit c658894562ba
("Thermal: int3406_thermal: fix thermal sysfs I/F").

thanks,
rui
> ---
>  drivers/thermal/int340x_thermal/int3406_thermal.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/int340x_thermal/int3406_thermal.c
> b/drivers/thermal/int340x_thermal/int3406_thermal.c
> index e31509ead1c9..f69ab026ba24 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/int340x_thermal/int3406_thermal.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/int340x_thermal/int3406_thermal.c
> @@ -113,7 +113,6 @@ static void int3406_thermal_get_limit(struct
> int3406_thermal_data *d)
>  {
>  	acpi_status status;
>  	unsigned long long lower_limit, upper_limit;
> -	int index;
>  
>  	status = acpi_evaluate_integer(d->handle, "DDDL", NULL,
> &lower_limit);
>  	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))