[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170904045645.fb6scegrypdodvfl@ninjato>
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2017 06:56:47 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] i2c: Hookup typec power-negotation to the PMIC
and charger
Hi,
> The first 2 patches are i2c patches, if you could review and
> merge these (preferably for 4.14, but 4.15 is fine too) that would
> be great.
Definately for v4.15 and I very likely won't be able to review them
before rc1 or rc2 time, if even that. Sorry, but I2C core changes need
extra careful review and I2C maintenance is largely done in my limited
spare time. If you could get other people to review/tag the patches,
this would be very helpful.
> Darren, Andy, the single platform/x86 patch in here should only
> be merged after the 2 i2c patches are in place, otherwise users
> of the board(s) in question will end up not having any battery
> monitoring. Also note that this patch applies on top of the
> "[PATCH v2] platform/x86: intel_cht_int33fe: Work around BIOS bug on some devices"
> patch I send out yesterday.
Is that dependency for v4.14? Would it be an idea if I take the platform
patch via the i2c tree then?
Regards,
Wolfram
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists