linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 4 Sep 2017 16:04:09 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
        Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Janakarajan Natarajan <Janakarajan.Natarajan@....com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with Linus' tree

Hi all,

On Fri, 25 Aug 2017 14:34:16 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the kvm tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   5442c2699552 ("x86/cpufeature, kvm/svm: Rename (shorten) the new "virtualized VMSAVE/VMLOAD" CPUID flag")
> 
> from Linus' tree and commit:
> 
>   d837312dfd5b ("KVM: SVM: Add Virtual GIF feature definition")
> 
> from the kvm tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
> 
> diff --cc arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> index 42bbbf0f173d,0e25e7a8ab03..000000000000
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> @@@ -287,7 -286,8 +287,8 @@@
>   #define X86_FEATURE_PAUSEFILTER (15*32+10) /* filtered pause intercept */
>   #define X86_FEATURE_PFTHRESHOLD (15*32+12) /* pause filter threshold */
>   #define X86_FEATURE_AVIC	(15*32+13) /* Virtual Interrupt Controller */
>  -#define X86_FEATURE_VIRTUAL_VMLOAD_VMSAVE (15*32+15) /* Virtual VMLOAD VMSAVE */
>  +#define X86_FEATURE_V_VMSAVE_VMLOAD (15*32+15) /* Virtual VMSAVE VMLOAD */
> + #define X86_FEATURE_VGIF	(15*32+16) /* Virtual GIF */
>   
>   /* Intel-defined CPU features, CPUID level 0x00000007:0 (ecx), word 16 */
>   #define X86_FEATURE_AVX512VBMI  (16*32+ 1) /* AVX512 Vector Bit Manipulation instructions*/

Just a reminder that this conflict still exists.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell