[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170904160756.32f3a55c@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2017 16:07:56 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the spi tree
Hi all,
On Mon, 28 Aug 2017 14:05:03 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in:
>
> tools/Makefile
>
> between commit:
>
> e9d4650dcc59 ("spi: tools: add install section")
>
> from the spi tree and commit:
>
> ecda85e70277 ("x86/lguest: Remove lguest support")
>
> from the tip tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc tools/Makefile
> index 616e7722b327,a19b176b914b..000000000000
> --- a/tools/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/Makefile
> @@@ -90,8 -89,8 +89,8 @@@ freefall: FORC
> kvm_stat: FORCE
> $(call descend,kvm/$@)
>
> - all: acpi cgroup cpupower gpio hv firewire lguest liblockdep \
> + all: acpi cgroup cpupower gpio hv firewire liblockdep \
> - perf selftests turbostat usb \
> + perf selftests spi turbostat usb \
> virtio vm net x86_energy_perf_policy \
> tmon freefall objtool kvm_stat
>
> @@@ -101,7 -100,7 +100,7 @@@ acpi_install
> cpupower_install:
> $(call descend,power/$(@:_install=),install)
>
> - cgroup_install firewire_install gpio_install hv_install lguest_install perf_install spi_install usb_install virtio_install vm_install net_install objtool_install:
> -cgroup_install firewire_install gpio_install hv_install perf_install usb_install virtio_install vm_install net_install objtool_install:
> ++cgroup_install firewire_install gpio_install hv_install perf_install spi_install usb_install virtio_install vm_install net_install objtool_install:
> $(call descend,$(@:_install=),install)
>
> liblockdep_install:
Just a reminder that this conflict still exists.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Powered by blists - more mailing lists