linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the dmi tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170904163733.008c3b63@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Mon, 4 Sep 2017 16:37:33 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the dmi tree

Hi Jean,

On Fri, 01 Sep 2017 15:20:21 +0200 Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de> wrote:
>
> On jeu., 2017-08-31 at 11:07 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > 
> > Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in:
> > 
> >   drivers/acpi/blacklist.c
> > 
> > between commit:
> > 
> >   f996c4155d0d ("dmi: Mark all struct dmi_system_id instances const")
> > 
> > from the dmi tree and commit:
> > 
> >   5aa5911a0ed9 ("ACPI / blacklist: add acpi_match_platform_list()")
> > 
> > from the pm tree.
> > 
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This  
> 
> Below, where?

Oops sorry, I think this is it:

d75dc5255183bfae1181f5e1e8b260f18794d79d
diff --cc drivers/acpi/blacklist.c
index f58bbc368f88,037fd537bbf6..995c4d8922b1
--- a/drivers/acpi/blacklist.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/blacklist.c
@@@ -30,24 -30,7 +30,7 @@@
  
  #include "internal.h"
  
- enum acpi_blacklist_predicates {
- 	all_versions,
- 	less_than_or_equal,
- 	equal,
- 	greater_than_or_equal,
- };
- 
- struct acpi_blacklist_item {
- 	char oem_id[7];
- 	char oem_table_id[9];
- 	u32 oem_revision;
- 	char *table;
- 	enum acpi_blacklist_predicates oem_revision_predicate;
- 	char *reason;
- 	u32 is_critical_error;
- };
- 
 -static struct dmi_system_id acpi_rev_dmi_table[] __initdata;
 +static const struct dmi_system_id acpi_rev_dmi_table[] __initconst;
  
  /*
   * POLICY: If *anything* doesn't work, put it on the blacklist.


-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell