| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <2690239b-27a7-dce3-88a6-d53808e8e93c@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2017 16:04:53 +0100
From: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@....com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
ALKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Harb Abdulhamid <harba@...eaurora.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
Ryan Harkin <Ryan.Harkin@....com>,
Roy Franz <roy.franz@...ium.com>, Loc Ho <lho@....com>,
Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/18] firmware: arm_scmi: add initial support for
performance protocol
Hi Sudeep,
On 04/08/17 15:31, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> The performance protocol is intended for the performance management of
> group(s) of device(s) that run in the same performance domain. It
> includes even the CPUs. A performance domain is defined by a set of
> devices that always have to run at the same performance level.
> For example, a set of CPUs that share a voltage domain, and have a
> common frequency control, is said to be in the same performance domain.
>
> The commands in this protocol provide functionality to describe the
> protocol version, describe various attribute flags, set and get the
> performance level of a domain. It also supports discovery of the list
> of performance levels supported by a performance domain, and the
> properties of each performance level.
>
> This patch adds basic support for the performance protocol.
>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
> ---
> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/Makefile | 2 +-
> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h | 1 +
> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c | 511 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/scmi_protocol.h | 31 +++
> 4 files changed, 544 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/Makefile b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/Makefile
> index 21d01d1d6b9c..159de726ee45 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/Makefile
> @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_SCMI_PROTOCOL) = arm_scmi.o
> -arm_scmi-y = base.o driver.o
> +arm_scmi-y = base.o driver.o perf.o
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h
> index e3fe5d9acc82..7473dfcad4ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
> #define PROTOCOL_REV_MAJOR(x) ((x) >> PROTOCOL_REV_MINOR_BITS)
> #define PROTOCOL_REV_MINOR(x) ((x) & PROTOCOL_REV_MINOR_MASK)
> #define MAX_PROTOCOLS_IMP 16
> +#define MAX_OPPS 16
>
> enum scmi_std_protocol {
> SCMI_PROTOCOL_BASE = 0x10,
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..13d84d829201
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,511 @@
> +/*
> + * System Control and Management Interface (SCMI) Performance Protocol
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2017 ARM Ltd.
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
> + * under the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public License,
> + * version 2, as published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope it will be useful, but WITHOUT
> + * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
> + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for
> + * more details.
> + *
> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along
> + * with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_opp.h>
> +#include <linux/sort.h>
> +
> +#include "common.h"
> +
> +enum scmi_performance_protocol_cmd {
> + PERF_DOMAIN_ATTRIBUTES = 0x3,
> + PERF_DESCRIBE_LEVELS = 0x4,
> + PERF_LIMITS_SET = 0x5,
> + PERF_LIMITS_GET = 0x6,
> + PERF_LEVEL_SET = 0x7,
> + PERF_LEVEL_GET = 0x8,
> + PERF_NOTIFY_LIMITS = 0x9,
> + PERF_NOTIFY_LEVEL = 0xa,
> +};
> +
> +struct scmi_opp {
> + u32 perf;
> + u32 power;
> + u32 trans_latency_us;
> +};
> +
> +struct scmi_msg_resp_perf_attributes {
> + __le16 num_domains;
> + __le16 flags;
> +#define POWER_SCALE_IN_MILLIWATT(x) ((x) & BIT(0))
> + __le32 stats_addr_low;
> + __le32 stats_addr_high;
> + __le32 stats_size;
> +};
> +
> +struct scmi_msg_resp_perf_domain_attributes {
> + __le32 flags;
> +#define SUPPORTS_SET_LIMITS(x) ((x) & BIT(31))
> +#define SUPPORTS_SET_PERF_LVL(x) ((x) & BIT(30))
> +#define SUPPORTS_PERF_LIMIT_NOTIFY(x) ((x) & BIT(29))
> +#define SUPPORTS_PERF_LEVEL_NOTIFY(x) ((x) & BIT(28))
> + __le32 rate_limit_us;
> + __le32 sustained_freq_khz;
> + __le32 sustained_perf_level;
> + u8 name[SCMI_MAX_STR_SIZE];
> +};
> +
> +struct scmi_msg_perf_describe_levels {
> + __le32 domain;
> + __le32 level_index;
> +};
> +
> +struct scmi_perf_set_limits {
> + __le32 domain;
> + __le32 max_level;
> + __le32 min_level;
> +};
> +
> +struct scmi_perf_get_limits {
> + __le32 max_level;
> + __le32 min_level;
> +};
> +
> +struct scmi_perf_set_level {
> + __le32 domain;
> + __le32 level;
> +};
> +
> +struct scmi_perf_notify_level_or_limits {
> + __le32 domain;
> + __le32 notify_enable;
> +};
> +
> +struct scmi_msg_resp_perf_describe_levels {
> + __le16 num_returned;
> + __le16 num_remaining;
> + struct {
> + __le32 perf_val;
> + __le32 power;
> + __le16 transition_latency_us;
> + __le16 reserved;
> + } opp[0];
> +};
> +
> +struct perf_dom_info {
> + bool set_limits;
> + bool set_perf;
> + bool perf_limit_notify;
> + bool perf_level_notify;
> + u32 opp_count;
> + u32 sustained_freq_khz;
> + u32 sustained_perf_level;
> + u32 mult_factor;
> + char name[SCMI_MAX_STR_SIZE];
> + struct scmi_opp opp[MAX_OPPS];
> +};
> +
> +struct scmi_perf_info {
> + int num_domains;
> + bool power_scale_mw;
> + u64 stats_addr;
> + u32 stats_size;
> + struct perf_dom_info *dom_info;
> +};
> +
> +static struct scmi_perf_info perf_info;
> +
> +static int scmi_perf_attributes_get(const struct scmi_handle *handle,
> + struct scmi_perf_info *perf_info)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + struct scmi_xfer *t;
> + struct scmi_msg_resp_perf_attributes *attr;
> +
> + ret = scmi_one_xfer_init(handle, PROTOCOL_ATTRIBUTES,
> + SCMI_PROTOCOL_PERF, 0, sizeof(*attr), &t);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + attr = t->rx.buf;
> +
> + ret = scmi_do_xfer(handle, t);
> + if (!ret) {
> + u16 flags = le16_to_cpu(attr->flags);
> +
> + perf_info->num_domains = le16_to_cpu(attr->num_domains);
> + perf_info->power_scale_mw = POWER_SCALE_IN_MILLIWATT(flags);
> + perf_info->stats_addr = le32_to_cpu(attr->stats_addr_low) |
> + (u64)le32_to_cpu(attr->stats_addr_high) << 32;
This seems odd, shouldn't it be the following?
le64_to_cpu(attr->stats_addr_low | (__le64)attr->stats_addr_high << 32)
Cheers,
--
Julien Thierry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists