[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170905190555.gfnpoohbptbjvbg3@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2017 22:05:55 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Alexander Steffen <Alexander.Steffen@...ineon.com>
Cc: tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tpm-dev-common: Reject too short writes
On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 07:36:42PM +0200, Alexander Steffen wrote:
> tpm_transmit() does not offer an explicit interface to indicate the number
> of valid bytes in the communication buffer. Instead, it relies on the
> commandSize field in the TPM header that is encoded within the buffer.
> Therefore, ensure that a) enough data has been written to the buffer, so
> that the commandSize field is present and b) the commandSize field does not
> announce more data than has been written to the buffer.
>
> This should have been fixed with CVE-2011-1161 long ago, but apparently
> a correct version of that patch never made it into the kernel.
>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Steffen <Alexander.Steffen@...ineon.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - Moved all changes to tpm_common_write in a single patch.
>
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm-dev-common.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-dev-common.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-dev-common.c
> index 610638a..ac25574 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-dev-common.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-dev-common.c
> @@ -99,7 +99,8 @@ ssize_t tpm_common_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
> if (atomic_read(&priv->data_pending) != 0)
> return -EBUSY;
>
> - if (in_size > TPM_BUFSIZE)
> + if (in_size > sizeof(priv->data_buffer) || in_size < 6 ||
> + in_size < be32_to_cpu(*((__be32 *) (buf + 2))))
> return -E2BIG;
>
> mutex_lock(&priv->buffer_mutex);
> --
> 2.7.4
>
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
There's now some delay getting patches to my git tree because next week
is conference week and I have lots of stuff to do before I depart
Finland. I'm sorry about that.
At latest I push these during the plane trip (I can remotely access
test machines with plane internet connection, not the first time I'm
doing this).
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists