linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 35/40] tracing: Reverse the order event_mutex/trace_types

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <4b52f9b1c49599780af1a193736df609b2785a63.1504642143.git.tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue,  5 Sep 2017 16:57:47 -0500
From:   Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>
To:     rostedt@...dmis.org
Cc:     tglx@...utronix.de, mhiramat@...nel.org, namhyung@...nel.org,
        vedang.patel@...el.com, bigeasy@...utronix.de,
        joel.opensrc@...il.com, joelaf@...gle.com,
        mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, baohong.liu@...el.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
        Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 35/40] tracing: Reverse the order event_mutex/trace_types_lock are taken

Change the order event_mutex and trace_types_lock are taken, to avoid
circular dependencies and lockdep spew.

Changing the order shouldn't matter to any current code, but does to
anything that takes the event_mutex first and then trace_types_lock.
This is the case when calling tracing_set_clock from inside an event
command, which already holds the event_mutex.

Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>
---
 kernel/trace/trace_events.c | 16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
index c93540c..889802c 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
@@ -1406,8 +1406,8 @@ static int subsystem_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
 	/* Make sure the system still exists */
-	mutex_lock(&trace_types_lock);
 	mutex_lock(&event_mutex);
+	mutex_lock(&trace_types_lock);
 	list_for_each_entry(tr, &ftrace_trace_arrays, list) {
 		list_for_each_entry(dir, &tr->systems, list) {
 			if (dir == inode->i_private) {
@@ -1421,8 +1421,8 @@ static int subsystem_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
 		}
 	}
  exit_loop:
-	mutex_unlock(&event_mutex);
 	mutex_unlock(&trace_types_lock);
+	mutex_unlock(&event_mutex);
 
 	if (!system)
 		return -ENODEV;
@@ -2294,15 +2294,15 @@ void trace_event_eval_update(struct trace_eval_map **map, int len)
 int trace_add_event_call(struct trace_event_call *call)
 {
 	int ret;
-	mutex_lock(&trace_types_lock);
 	mutex_lock(&event_mutex);
+	mutex_lock(&trace_types_lock);
 
 	ret = __register_event(call, NULL);
 	if (ret >= 0)
 		__add_event_to_tracers(call);
 
-	mutex_unlock(&event_mutex);
 	mutex_unlock(&trace_types_lock);
+	mutex_unlock(&event_mutex);
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -2356,13 +2356,13 @@ int trace_remove_event_call(struct trace_event_call *call)
 {
 	int ret;
 
-	mutex_lock(&trace_types_lock);
 	mutex_lock(&event_mutex);
+	mutex_lock(&trace_types_lock);
 	down_write(&trace_event_sem);
 	ret = probe_remove_event_call(call);
 	up_write(&trace_event_sem);
-	mutex_unlock(&event_mutex);
 	mutex_unlock(&trace_types_lock);
+	mutex_unlock(&event_mutex);
 
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -2424,8 +2424,8 @@ static int trace_module_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
 {
 	struct module *mod = data;
 
-	mutex_lock(&trace_types_lock);
 	mutex_lock(&event_mutex);
+	mutex_lock(&trace_types_lock);
 	switch (val) {
 	case MODULE_STATE_COMING:
 		trace_module_add_events(mod);
@@ -2434,8 +2434,8 @@ static int trace_module_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
 		trace_module_remove_events(mod);
 		break;
 	}
-	mutex_unlock(&event_mutex);
 	mutex_unlock(&trace_types_lock);
+	mutex_unlock(&event_mutex);
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
1.9.3