[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2a5d4299-2523-aef5-7db1-f351ca66b562@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 09:17:41 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To: gengdongjiu <gengdongjiu@...wei.com>,
"christoffer.dall@...aro.org" <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"rkrcmar@...hat.com" <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
"vladimir.murzin@....com" <vladimir.murzin@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: James Morse <James.Morse@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: KVM: VHE: save and restore some PSTATE bits
On 05/09/17 19:58, gengdongjiu wrote:
> when exit from guest, some host PSTATE bits may be lost, such as
> PSTATE.PAN or PSTATE.UAO. It is because host and hypervisor all run
> in the EL2, host PSTATE value cannot be saved and restored via
> SPSR_EL2. So if guest has changed the PSTATE, host continues with
> a wrong value guest has set.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dongjiu Geng <gengdongjiu@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Haibin Zhang <zhanghaibin7@...wei.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 8 +++++++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h | 2 ++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/entry.S | 2 --
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++--
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 6 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index e923b58..cba7d3e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -193,6 +193,12 @@ struct kvm_cpu_context {
> };
> };
>
> +struct kvm_cpu_host_pstate {
> + u64 daif;
> + u64 uao;
> + u64 pan;
> +};
I love it. This is the most expensive way of saving/restoring a single
32bit value.
More seriously, please see the discussion between James and Christoffer
there[1]. I expect James to address the PAN/UAO states together with the
debug state in the next iteration of his patch.
Thanks,
M.
[1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg599798.html
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists