[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1709061033280.1843@nanos>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 10:36:29 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: "chengjian (D)" <cj.chengjian@...wei.com>
cc: huawei.libin@...wei.com, mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
dvhart@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: a competition when some threads acquire futex
On Wed, 6 Sep 2017, chengjian (D) wrote:
> > > diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
> > > index 3d38eaf..0b2d17a 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/futex.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/futex.c
> > > @@ -1545,6 +1545,7 @@ static int wake_futex_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, u32
> > > uval,
> > > struct futex_pi_state *pi_
> > > spin_unlock(&hb->lock);
> > > wake_up_q(&wake_q);
> > > + _cond_resched( );
> >
> I wrote _cond_resched( ) in futex_wake( ) which will be called to wake up
> waiters
> when the process release the futex.
>
>
> But the patch producted by git format-patch displayed in wake_futex_pi( ).
Ok. Still that patch has issues.
1) It's white space damaged. Please use TAB not spaces for
indentation. checkpatch.pl would have told you.
2) Why are you using _cond_resched() instead of plain cond_resched().
cond_resched() is what you want to use.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists