[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8E47FDFD-809F-4EE9-9068-65BE50BE8BEB@vmware.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 14:11:22 +0000
From: "Jorgen S. Hansen" <jhansen@...are.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>
CC: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
"Stephen Hemminger" <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
George Zhang <georgezhang@...are.com>,
Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>, Asias He <asias@...hat.com>,
"Vitaly Kuznetsov" <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Cathy Avery <cavery@...hat.com>,
"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Rolf Neugebauer <rolf.neugebauer@...ker.com>,
Dave Scott <dave.scott@...ker.com>,
"Marcelo Cerri" <marcelo.cerri@...onical.com>,
"apw@...onical.com" <apw@...onical.com>,
"olaf@...fle.de" <olaf@...fle.de>,
"joe@...ches.com" <joe@...ches.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vsock: only load vmci transport on VMware hypervisor by
default
> On Aug 31, 2017, at 1:54 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 03:37:07PM +0000, Jorgen S. Hansen wrote:
>>> On Aug 29, 2017, at 4:36 AM, Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com> wrote:
>> If we allow multiple host side transports, virtio host side support and
>> vmci should be able to coexist regardless of the order of initialization.
>
> That sounds good to me.
>
> This means af_vsock.c needs to be aware of CID allocation. Currently the
> vhost_vsock.ko driver handles this itself (it keeps a list of CIDs and
> checks that they are not used twice). It should be possible to move
> that state into af_vsock.c so we have <cid, host_transport> pairs.
>
Yes, that was my thinking as well.
> I'm currently working on NFS over AF_VSOCK and sock_diag support (for
> ss(8) and netstat-like tools).
>
> Multi-transport support is lower priority for me at the moment. I'm
> happy to review patches though. If there is no progress on this by the
> end of the year then I will have time to work on it.
>
I’ll try to find time to write a more coherent proposal in the coming weeks,
and we can discuss that.
> Are either of you are in Prague, Czech Republic on October 25-27 for
> Linux Kernel Summit, Open Source Summit Europe, Embedded Linux
> Conference Europe, KVM Forum, or MesosCon Europe?
No, I won’t be there.
Thanks,
Jorgen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists