[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170906152928.8658-3-jgross@suse.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 17:29:28 +0200
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
x86@...nel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Cc: jeremy@...p.org, chrisw@...s-sol.org, akataria@...are.com,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, hpa@...or.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
longman@...hat.com, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] paravirt,xen: correct xen_nopvspin case
With the boot parameter "xen_nopvspin" specified a Xen guest should not
make use of paravirt spinlocks, but behave as if running on bare
metal. This is not true, however, as the qspinlock code will fall back
to a test-and-set scheme when it is detecting a hypervisor.
In order to avoid this disable the virt_spin_lock_key.
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
---
arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c b/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
index 25a7c4302ce7..e8ab80ad7a6f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <asm/paravirt.h>
+#include <asm/qspinlock.h>
#include <xen/interface/xen.h>
#include <xen/events.h>
@@ -129,6 +130,7 @@ void __init xen_init_spinlocks(void)
if (!xen_pvspin) {
printk(KERN_DEBUG "xen: PV spinlocks disabled\n");
+ static_branch_disable(&virt_spin_lock_key);
return;
}
printk(KERN_DEBUG "xen: PV spinlocks enabled\n");
--
2.12.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists