[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170906160415.crt2ajuf6553bit7@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 18:04:15 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, x86@...nel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, jeremy@...p.org,
chrisw@...s-sol.org, akataria@...are.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] paravirt/locks: use new static key for
controlling call of virt_spin_lock()
On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 11:49:49AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> > #define virt_spin_lock virt_spin_lock
> > static inline bool virt_spin_lock(struct qspinlock *lock)
> > {
> > + if (!static_branch_likely(&virt_spin_lock_key))
> > + return false;
> > if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR))
> > return false;
> >
Now native has two NOPs instead of one. Can't we merge these two static
branches?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists