linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC v3 0/4] Add cross-compilation support to eBPF samples

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170906032420.3bkvyz4p3wu2hyvy@ast-mbp>
Date:   Tue, 5 Sep 2017 20:24:21 -0700
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:     Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@...roid.com, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>,
        Alison Chaiken <alison@...-devel.com>,
        Chenbo Feng <fengc@...gle.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 0/4] Add cross-compilation support to eBPF samples

On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 11:23:21AM -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> These patches fix issues seen when cross-compiling eBPF samples on arm64.
> Compared to [1], I dropped the controversial inline-asm patch pending further
> discussion on the right way to do it. However these patches are still a step in
> the right direction and I wanted them to get in before the more controversial
> bit.

All patches in this set look good to me.
When you repost without changes after net-next reopens pls keep my:
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>