linux-kernel - Re: SME/32-bit regression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170906164417.2terp5ioelzglehq@pd.tnic>
Date:   Wed, 6 Sep 2017 18:44:17 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     "Lendacky, Thomas" <Thomas.Lendacky@....com>
Cc:     Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
        X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "Singh, Brijesh" <brijesh.singh@....com>
Subject: Re: SME/32-bit regression

On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 04:30:23PM +0000, Lendacky, Thomas wrote:
> Sorry for the top post, I'm on holiday and don't have access to a good
> email client... I went with unsigned long to match all the page table
> related declarations. If changing to u64 doesn't generate any warnings
> or other issues them I'm good with that.

Ok, no worries. Lemme run the smoke-tests on it and test it to see
everything else still works.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.