[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7791dee1-64a9-dcaa-c5d9-0b04a44bc526@akamai.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 16:22:30 -0400
From: Vishwanath Pai <vpai@...mai.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Josh Hunt <johunt@...mai.com>, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
coreteam@...filter.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: xt_hashlimit: avoid 64-bit division
On 09/06/2017 03:57 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> 64-bit division is expensive on 32-bit architectures, and
> requires a special function call to avoid a link error like:
>
> net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.o: In function `hashlimit_mt_common':
> xt_hashlimit.c:(.text+0x1328): undefined reference to `__aeabi_uldivmod'
>
> In the case of hashlimit_mt_common, we don't actually need a
> 64-bit operation, we can simply rewrite the function slightly
> to make that clear to the compiler.
>
> Fixes: bea74641e378 ("netfilter: xt_hashlimit: add rate match mode")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> ---
> net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c b/net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c
> index 10d48234f5f4..50b53d86eef5 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c
> @@ -531,7 +531,10 @@ static u64 user2rate_bytes(u64 user)
> {
> u64 r;
>
> - r = user ? 0xFFFFFFFFULL / user : 0xFFFFFFFFULL;
> + if (user > 0xFFFFFFFFULL)
> + return 0;
> +
> + r = user ? 0xFFFFFFFFULL / (u32)user : 0xFFFFFFFFULL;
> r = (r - 1) << 4;
> return r;
> }
>
I have submitted another patch to fix this:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/809881/
We have seen this problem before, I was careful not to introduce this
again in the new patch but clearly I overlooked this particular line :(
In the other cases we fixed it by replacing division with div64_u64().
-Vishwanath
Powered by blists - more mailing lists