[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1504729681-3504-13-git-send-email-deller@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 22:27:59 +0200
From: Helge Deller <deller@....de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: [PATCH 12/14] mm/memblock: Use %pS printk format for direct addresses
The debug code in memblock uses wrongly the %pF instead of the %pS printk
format specifier for printing symbols for the address returned by
_builtin_return_address(0)/_RET_IP_. Fix it for the ia64, ppc64 and parisc64
architectures.
Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <deller@....de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
---
mm/memblock.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index 9120578..7f1590d 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -597,7 +597,7 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_add(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
{
phys_addr_t end = base + size - 1;
- memblock_dbg("memblock_add: [%pa-%pa] %pF\n",
+ memblock_dbg("memblock_add: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n",
&base, &end, (void *)_RET_IP_);
return memblock_add_range(&memblock.memory, base, size, MAX_NUMNODES, 0);
@@ -704,7 +704,7 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_free(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
{
phys_addr_t end = base + size - 1;
- memblock_dbg(" memblock_free: [%pa-%pa] %pF\n",
+ memblock_dbg(" memblock_free: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n",
&base, &end, (void *)_RET_IP_);
kmemleak_free_part_phys(base, size);
@@ -715,7 +715,7 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_reserve(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
{
phys_addr_t end = base + size - 1;
- memblock_dbg("memblock_reserve: [%pa-%pa] %pF\n",
+ memblock_dbg("memblock_reserve: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n",
&base, &end, (void *)_RET_IP_);
return memblock_add_range(&memblock.reserved, base, size, MAX_NUMNODES, 0);
@@ -1362,7 +1362,7 @@ void * __init memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid_nopanic(
phys_addr_t min_addr, phys_addr_t max_addr,
int nid)
{
- memblock_dbg("%s: %llu bytes align=0x%llx nid=%d from=0x%llx max_addr=0x%llx %pF\n",
+ memblock_dbg("%s: %llu bytes align=0x%llx nid=%d from=0x%llx max_addr=0x%llx %pS\n",
__func__, (u64)size, (u64)align, nid, (u64)min_addr,
(u64)max_addr, (void *)_RET_IP_);
return memblock_virt_alloc_internal(size, align, min_addr,
@@ -1394,7 +1394,7 @@ void * __init memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid(
{
void *ptr;
- memblock_dbg("%s: %llu bytes align=0x%llx nid=%d from=0x%llx max_addr=0x%llx %pF\n",
+ memblock_dbg("%s: %llu bytes align=0x%llx nid=%d from=0x%llx max_addr=0x%llx %pS\n",
__func__, (u64)size, (u64)align, nid, (u64)min_addr,
(u64)max_addr, (void *)_RET_IP_);
ptr = memblock_virt_alloc_internal(size, align,
@@ -1418,7 +1418,7 @@ void * __init memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid(
*/
void __init __memblock_free_early(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
{
- memblock_dbg("%s: [%#016llx-%#016llx] %pF\n",
+ memblock_dbg("%s: [%#016llx-%#016llx] %pS\n",
__func__, (u64)base, (u64)base + size - 1,
(void *)_RET_IP_);
kmemleak_free_part_phys(base, size);
@@ -1438,7 +1438,7 @@ void __init __memblock_free_late(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
{
u64 cursor, end;
- memblock_dbg("%s: [%#016llx-%#016llx] %pF\n",
+ memblock_dbg("%s: [%#016llx-%#016llx] %pS\n",
__func__, (u64)base, (u64)base + size - 1,
(void *)_RET_IP_);
kmemleak_free_part_phys(base, size);
--
2.1.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists