[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <80046e97-9d4f-728f-337a-37969aac297e@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 17:03:51 -0400
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
Cc: "Lendacky, Thomas" <Thomas.Lendacky@....com>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: SME/32-bit regression
On 09/06/2017 02:19 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 01:06:50PM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote:
>> I did the following quick run with your patch and everything seems to be
>> working okay
>>
>> 64-bit build:
>> -------
>> 1) Baremetal SME *enabled* - System boots fine
>> a) 32-bit guest launch : successful (KVM HV)
>> b) 64-bit guest launch : successful (KVM HV)
>> c) 64-bit SEV guest launch : successful (KVM HV)
>>
>> 2) Baremetal SME *disabled* - System boots fine
>> a) 32-bit guest launch : successful (KVM HV)
>> b) 64-bit guest launch : successful (KVM HV)
>> c) 64-bit SEV guest launch : successful (KVM HV)
>>
>> 32-bit build
>> ----------
>> I am installing 32-bit distro to verify 32-bit baremetal boot and will
>> report my findings soon.
> Thanks Brijesh, that's awesome!
>
> I'll add your Tested-by once you're done testing successfully.
You can have my Tested-by (mostly Xen but some baremetal too).
-boris
Powered by blists - more mailing lists