[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87vakvpj5b.fsf@firstfloor.org>
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2017 15:16:48 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 00/17] Pile o' entry stack changes
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> writes:
>
> - Lots of people (Linus included) have asked to convert the entry
> code to pop registers on exit instead of movqing them off the
> stack. This makes a bunch of progress in that direction.
You should benchmark it on Atoms. Likely it's a regression there
because they don't have the special PUSH/POP acceleration.
-Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists