linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] selftests: Enhance kselftest_harness.h to print which assert failed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 7 Sep 2017 00:44:06 +0200
From:   Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
To:     shuah@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] selftests: Enhance kselftest_harness.h to print which
 assert failed



On 06/09/2017 03:26, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 09/05/2017 02:38 PM, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 28/08/2017 18:42, Shuah Khan wrote:
>>> On 08/06/2017 05:23 PM, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
>>>> When a test process is not able to write to TH_LOG_STREAM, this step
>>>> mechanism enable to print the assert number which triggered the failure.
>>>> This can be enabled by setting _metadata->no_print to true at the
>>>> beginning of the test sequence.
>>>>
>>>> Update the seccomp-bpf test to return 0 if a test succeeded.
>>>>
>>>> This feature is needed for the Landlock tests.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
>>>> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
>>>> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>>>> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
>>>> Cc: Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>
>>>> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAGXu5j+D-FP8Kt9unNOqKrQJP4DYTpmgkJxWykZyrYiVPz3Y3Q@mail.gmail.com
>>>
>>> I am looking through my Inbox and found this one. Okay to pull
>>> this in for 4.14-rc1?
>>
>> Yes, could you please pull this one instead of the one from my Landlock
>> patch series [1] (which is already in your tree)? This patch is more
>> up-to-date and include documentation.
>>
> 
> Now this patch is in linux-kselftest next for 4.14-rc1 instead of
> the one from your landlock series. Please take a look and see if
> I git it right.

Yes, it is right. Thanks!

 Mickaël



Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)