[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1504764929.6355.5.camel@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2017 08:15:29 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Abysmal scheduler performance in Linus' tree?
On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 18:14 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 11:03:33AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 01:59:14AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > > > Any specifics on your setup?
> > >
> > > On further fiddling, I only see this after a suspend and resume cycle.
> >
> > Ah, ok. That's not something I otherwise test. Lets see if I can force
> > this brick of mine through a suspend-resume cycle :-)
>
> I'd be suspicious of these here commits:
>
> 77d1dfda0e79 ("sched/topology, cpuset: Avoid spurious/wrong domain rebuilds")
Seems to be that one. After suspend/resume, cpu7 (i4790+SMT) is online
with NULL domain. offline/online it, it grows proper domains.
-Mike
(on vacation, about to go explore that unfamiliar 'outside' place)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists