[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170907071534.ztbxvyfoo7m7esmw@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 09:15:34 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@...il.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com>,
Chandramouli Narayanan <mouli@...ux.intel.com>,
Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@....fi>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] x86/crypto: Fix RBP usage in several crypto .S
files
* Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@...il.com> wrote:
> Thanks for fixing these! I don't have time to review these in detail, but I ran
> the crypto self-tests on the affected algorithms, and they all pass. I also
> benchmarked them before and after; the only noticable performance difference was
> that sha256-avx2 and sha512-avx2 became a few percent slower. I don't suppose
> there is a way around that? Otherwise it's probably not a big deal.
Which CPU model did you use for the test?
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists