linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] mfd: Add support for Cherry Trail Dollar Cove TI PMIC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2362452.XVjrAATvXK@aspire.rjw.lan>
Date:   Thu, 07 Sep 2017 12:52:53 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        Johannes Stezenbach <js@...21.net>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] mfd: Add support for Cherry Trail Dollar Cove TI PMIC

On Thursday, September 7, 2017 9:39:03 AM CEST Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Sep 2017, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> > On Wednesday, September 6, 2017 12:52:09 PM CEST Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > > In any case, I wouldn't mind it if you took the [3/3] from this series, because
> > > > > if there are any conflicts with it, they will be trivial to resolve.  And I
> > > > > don't need an immutable branch with it or anything like that.
> > > > 
> > > > No problem.
> > > 
> > > Although you don't appear to have reviewed it?
> > 
> > I have reviewed it, although I haven't sent a tag.
> > 
> > Generally speaking, for drivers/acpi/pmic/ Reviewed-bys from Mika and Andy are
> > sufficient (they likely are more familiar with the code in there than I am),
> 
> I don't see them in MAINTAINERS.  I thought it was Len and yourself.

I do need help with code review at least in some areas, though.

Some of this information is missing from MAINTAINERS, but I guess that can be
addressed in this particular case.

Mika, Andy, would it be OK to add you as reviewers for drivers/acpi/pmic/
to MAINTAINERS?

Thanks,
Rafael