| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 17:49:13 +0200
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>,
MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy Natarajan <sathyaosid@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/11] usb: xhci: Add Intel cherrytrail extended cap /
otg phy mux handling
Hi,
On 07-09-17 15:14, Mathias Nyman wrote:
> On 05.09.2017 19:42, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> The Intel cherrytrail xhci controller has an extended cap mmio-range
>> which contains registers to control the muxing to the xhci (host mode)
>> or the dwc3 (device mode) and vbus-detection for the otg usb-phy.
>>
>> Having a mux driver included in the xhci code (or under drivers/usb/host)
>> is not desirable. So this commit adds a simple handler for this extended
>> capability, which creates a platform device with the caps mmio region as
>> resource, this allows us to write a separate platform mux driver for the
>> mux.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in v2:
>> -Check xHCI controller PCI device-id instead of only checking for the
>> Intel Extended capability ID, as the Extended capability ID is used on
>> other model Intel xHCI controllers too
>> ---
>> drivers/usb/host/Makefile | 2 +-
>> drivers/usb/host/xhci-intel-quirks.c | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c | 4 ++
>> drivers/usb/host/xhci.h | 2 +
>> 4 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/usb/host/xhci-intel-quirks.c
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/Makefile b/drivers/usb/host/Makefile
>> index cf2691fffcc0..441edf82eb1c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/host/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/Makefile
>> @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_USB_OHCI_HCD_DAVINCI) += ohci-da8xx.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_USB_UHCI_HCD) += uhci-hcd.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_USB_FHCI_HCD) += fhci.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD) += xhci-hcd.o
>> -obj-$(CONFIG_USB_XHCI_PCI) += xhci-pci.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_USB_XHCI_PCI) += xhci-pci.o xhci-intel-quirks.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_USB_XHCI_PLATFORM) += xhci-plat-hcd.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_USB_XHCI_MTK) += xhci-mtk.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_USB_XHCI_TEGRA) += xhci-tegra.o
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-intel-quirks.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-intel-quirks.c
>> new file mode 100644
>
> I think it would be better to have one place where we add handlers for
> vendor specific extended capabilities.
>
> Something like xhci-vendor-ext-caps.c, or just xhci-ext-caps.c as
> there's a xhci-ext-caps.h header already
>
> We could walk through the capability list once and add the needed handlers.
> Something like:
>
> +int xhci_ext_cap_init(void __iomem *base)
This will need to take a struct xhci_hcd *xhci param instead
as some of the ext_cap handling (including the cht mux code)
will need access to this.
> +{
> + u32 val;
> + u32 cap_offset;
> +
> + cap_offset = xhci_next_ext_cap(base, 0);
> +
> + while (cap_offset) {
> + val = readl(base + cap_offset);
> +
> + switch (XHCI_EXT_CAPS_ID(val)) {
> + case XHCI_EXT_CAPS_VENDOR_INTEL:
> + /* check hw/id/something, and call what's needed */
So I see 2 options here (without making this function PCI specific)
1) Add an u32 product_id field to struct xhci_hcd; or
2) Use a quirk flag as my current code is doing.
I'm fine with doing this either way, please let me know your preference.
> + break;
> + case XHCI_EXT_CAPS_VENDOR_XYZ:
> + /* do something */
> + break;
> + default:
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + printk(KERN_ERR "MATTU EXT_CAP id %d\n", XHCI_EXT_CAPS_ID(val));
> +
> + cap_offset = xhci_next_ext_cap(base, cap_offset);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
>
> xhci_next_ext_cap() doesn't exist anywhere else than my local sandbox branch yet.
Can you do a "git format-patch" of that and send it to me? If you
can give me that + your preference for how to check if we're
dealing with a cht xhci hcd in xhci_ext_cap_init I can do a v3
with your suggestions applied.
>
>> +
>> +/* Extended capability IDs for Intel Vendor Defined */
>> +#define XHCI_EXT_CAPS_INTEL_HOST_CAP 192
>
> XHCI_EXT_CAPS_VENDOR_INTEL
> and should be in xhci-ext-caps.h
Ok.
Regards,
Hans
>
>> +
>> +static void xhci_intel_unregister_pdev(void *arg)
>> +{
>> + platform_device_unregister(arg);
>> +}
>> +
>> +int xhci_create_intel_cht_mux_pdev(struct xhci_hcd *xhci)
>> +{
>> + struct usb_hcd *hcd = xhci_to_hcd(xhci);
>> + struct device *dev = hcd->self.controller;
>> + struct platform_device *pdev;
>> + struct resource res = { 0, };
>> + int ret, ext_offset;
>> +
>> + ext_offset = xhci_find_next_ext_cap(&xhci->cap_regs->hc_capbase, 0,
>> + XHCI_EXT_CAPS_INTEL_HOST_CAP);
>> + if (!ext_offset) {
>> + xhci_err(xhci, "couldn't find Intel ext caps\n");
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> + }
>> +
>> + pdev = platform_device_alloc("intel_cht_usb_mux", PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE);
>> + if (!pdev) {
>> + xhci_err(xhci, "couldn't allocate intel_cht_usb_mux pdev\n");
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + }
>> +
>> + res.start = hcd->rsrc_start + ext_offset;
>> + res.end = res.start + 0x3ff;
>> + res.name = "intel_cht_usb_mux";
>> + res.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM;
>> +
>> + ret = platform_device_add_resources(pdev, &res, 1);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "couldn't add resources to intel_cht_usb_mux pdev\n");
>> + platform_device_put(pdev);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + pdev->dev.parent = dev;
>> +
>> + ret = platform_device_add(pdev);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "couldn't register intel_cht_usb_mux pdev\n");
>> + platform_device_put(pdev);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, xhci_intel_unregister_pdev, pdev);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "couldn't add unregister action for intel_cht_usb_mux pdev\n");
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c
>> index 8071c8fdd15e..b55c1e96abf0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c
>> @@ -188,6 +188,7 @@ static void xhci_pci_quirks(struct device *dev, struct xhci_hcd *xhci)
>> if (pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL &&
>> pdev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_CHERRYVIEW_XHCI) {
>> xhci->quirks |= XHCI_SSIC_PORT_UNUSED;
>> + xhci->quirks |= XHCI_INTEL_CHT_USB_MUX;
>> }
>> if (pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL &&
>> (pdev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_CHERRYVIEW_XHCI ||
>> @@ -328,6 +329,9 @@ static int xhci_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *dev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
>> if (xhci->quirks & XHCI_PME_STUCK_QUIRK)
>> xhci_pme_acpi_rtd3_enable(dev);
>>
>> + if (xhci->quirks & XHCI_INTEL_CHT_USB_MUX)
>> + xhci_create_intel_cht_mux_pdev(xhci);
>> +
>> /* USB-2 and USB-3 roothubs initialized, allow runtime pm suspend */
>> pm_runtime_put_noidle(&dev->dev);
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h
>> index e3e935291ed6..f722ee31e50d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h
>> @@ -1821,6 +1821,7 @@ struct xhci_hcd {
>> #define XHCI_LIMIT_ENDPOINT_INTERVAL_7 (1 << 26)
>> #define XHCI_U2_DISABLE_WAKE (1 << 27)
>> #define XHCI_ASMEDIA_MODIFY_FLOWCONTROL (1 << 28)
>> +#define XHCI_INTEL_CHT_USB_MUX (1 << 29)
>
> Everything you said about the quirk flags in v1 is true, and I hate to
> make the bulk of xhci even more PCI dependent, but I'm running out of flag bits and
> would like a better solution than the current quirk flags we have.
>
> This isn't really your concern, this patch is just doing it the same way it has
> always been done, but if you have a better idea I'm all ears.
>
> -Mathias
Powered by blists - more mailing lists