[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_Jsq+Da1=myQGEpA_0f+dEU0Rk6RB3BJHVCzq0M0MyJ3UDoQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 14:41:40 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] gpio: uniphier: add UniPhier GPIO controller driver
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 6:42 AM, Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
> This GPIO controller device is used on UniPhier SoCs.
>
> It also serves as an interrupt controller, but interrupt signals are
> just delivered to the parent irqchip without any latching or OR'ing.
> This is implemented by using hierarchy IRQ domain.
>
> Implementation note:
> Unfortunately, the IRQ mapping from this controller to the parent is
> random. (48, 49, ..., 63, 154, 155, ...)
> If "interrupts" property is used, IRQ resources may be statically
> allocated when platform devices are populated from DT. This can be
> a problem for the hierarchy IRQ domain because IRQ allocation must
> happen from the outer-most domain up to the root domain in order to
> build up the stacked IRQ. (https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/7/6/758)
> Solutions to work around it could be to hard-code parent hwirqs or
> to invent a driver-specific DT property.
>
> Here, the new API irq_domain_push_irq() was merged by v4.14-rc1.
> It allows to add irq_data to the existing hierarchy. It will help
> to make this driver work whether the parent has already initialized
> the hierarchy or not.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v4:
> - Add COMPILE_TEST and select IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY
> - Reimplement irqchip part by using irq_domain_push_irq()
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Add .irq_set_affinity() hook
> - Use irq_domain_create_hierarchy() instead of legacy
> irq_domain_add_hierarchy()
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Remove +32 offset for parent interrupts to follow the GIC
> binding convention
> - Let uniphier_gpio_irq_alloc() fail if nr_irqs != 1
> - Allocate gpio_chip statically because just one instance is
> supported
> - Fix suspend and resume hooks
>
> .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-uniphier.txt | 43 ++
What happened to my ack? One line here more that before, but I'm not
going to diff your patches for you.
BTW, it is preferred to split bindings to a separate patch.
> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> drivers/gpio/Kconfig | 8 +
> drivers/gpio/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/gpio/gpio-uniphier.c | 486 +++++++++++++++++++++
> include/dt-bindings/gpio/uniphier-gpio.h | 18 +
> 6 files changed, 557 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-uniphier.txt
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpio/gpio-uniphier.c
> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/gpio/uniphier-gpio.h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists