lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 8 Sep 2017 08:14:32 +0200
From:   Arnaud Mouiche <arnaud.mouiche@...oxia.com>
To:     Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>, broonie@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, tiwai@...e.com, perex@...ex.cz,
        lgirdwood@...il.com, fabio.estevam@....com, timur@...i.org,
        lukma@...x.de, caleb@...me.org, max.krummenacher@...adex.com,
        mpa@...gutronix.de, mail@...iej.szmigiero.name
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_ssi: Override bit clock rate based on slot
 number


On 08/09/2017 07:42, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 10:23:43PM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
>> The set_sysclk() now is used to override the output bit clock rate.
>> But this is not a common way to implement a set_dai_sysclk(). And
>> this creates a problem when a general machine driver (simple-card
>> for example) tries to do set_dai_sysclk() by passing an input clock
>> rate for the baud clock instead of setting the bit clock rate as
>> fsl_ssi driver expected.
>>
>> So this patch solves this problem by firstly removing set_sysclk()
>> since the hw_params() can calculate the bit clock rate. Secondly,
>> in order not to break those TDM use cases which previously might
>> have been using set_sysclk() to override the bit clock rate, this
>> patch changes the driver to override it based on the slot number.
>>
>> The patch also removes an obsolete comment of the dir parameter.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>
> Forgot to mention, I think that it's better to wait for a couple of
> Tested-by from those who use the TDM mode of SSI before applying it.
I can check next monday or tuesday.
Arnaud
> Thanks
> Nicolin

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ