[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGb2v64K3XTLJwZwYmq3r64=3_bHHGTeGyC0gfoJfL5+Ty53ag@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2017 15:39:04 +0800
From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
To: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/10] arm64: dts: allwinner: Restore EMAC changes
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Corentin Labbe
<clabbe.montjoie@...il.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 09:19:54AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 09:11:47AM +0200, Corentin Labbe wrote:
>> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5-nanopi-neo2.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5-nanopi-neo2.dts
>> > index 1c2387bd5df6..968908761194 100644
>> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5-nanopi-neo2.dts
>> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5-nanopi-neo2.dts
>> > @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@
>> > compatible = "friendlyarm,nanopi-neo2", "allwinner,sun50i-h5";
>> >
>> > aliases {
>> > + ethernet0 = &emac;
>> > serial0 = &uart0;
>> > };
>> >
>> > @@ -108,6 +109,22 @@
>> > status = "okay";
>> > };
>> >
>> > +&emac {
>> > + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> > + pinctrl-0 = <&emac_rgmii_pins>;
>> > + phy-supply = <®_gmac_3v3>;
>> > + phy-handle = <&ext_rgmii_phy>;
>> > + phy-mode = "rgmii";
>> > + status = "okay";
>> > +};
>> > +
>> > +&mdio {
>> > + ext_rgmii_phy: ethernet-phy@7 {
>> > + compatible = "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c22";
>> > + reg = <7>;
>> > + };
>> > +};
>> > +
>>
>> This won't compile, you don't have that node in the H5 DTSI.
>>
>
> Since H5 DTSI include arm/sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi it compiles.
> Furthermore, I restested just now and confirm, it compiles fine.
The order of your patches are wrong. No individual patch should
introduce build failures, not just the whole patch series.
ChenYu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists