| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20170908093404.7dfikzfgrcytvbp7@mwanda>
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2017 12:34:54 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Badhri Jagan Sridharan <badhri@...gle.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: typec: tcpm: Validate source and sink caps
On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 06:22:13PM -0700, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote:
> +static int tcpm_validate_caps(struct tcpm_port *port, const u32 *pdo,
> + unsigned int nr_pdo)
> +{
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + /* Should at least contain vSafe5v */
> + if (nr_pdo < 1) {
> + tcpm_log_force(port,
> + " err: source/sink caps should atleast have vSafe5V");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + /* The vSafe5V Fixed Supply Object Shall always be the first object */
> + if (pdo_type(pdo[0]) != PDO_TYPE_FIXED ||
> + pdo_fixed_voltage(pdo[0]) != VSAFE5V) {
> + tcpm_log_force(port,
> + " err: vSafe5V Fixed Supply Object Shall always be the first object");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 1; i < nr_pdo; i++) {
> + if (pdo_type(pdo[i]) < pdo_type(pdo[i - 1])) {
> + tcpm_log_force(port,
> + " err:PDOs should be in the following order: Fixed; Battery; Variable. pdo index:%u"
> + , i);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + } else if (pdo_type(pdo[i]) == pdo_type(pdo[i - 1])) {
The else statement isn't needed. Pull this in one indent level.
> + enum pd_pdo_type type = pdo_type(pdo[i]);
> +
> + switch (type) {
> + /*
> + * The remaining Fixed Supply Objects, if
> + * present, shall be sent in voltage order;
> + * lowest to highest.
> + */
> + case PDO_TYPE_FIXED:
> + if (pdo_fixed_voltage(pdo[i]) <=
> + pdo_fixed_voltage(pdo[i - 1])) {
We can't have 2 fixed voltages which are the same? The <= is < in the
section below and the spec just says lowest to highest for everything.
(I am similar to John Snow in that I know nothing).
> + tcpm_log_force(port,
> + " err: Fixed supply pdos should be in increasing order, pdo index:%u"
> + , i);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + break;
> + /*
> + * The Battery Supply Objects and Variable
> + * supply, if present shall be sent in Minimum
> + * Voltage order; lowest to highest.
> + */
> + case PDO_TYPE_VAR:
> + case PDO_TYPE_BATT:
> + if (pdo_min_voltage(pdo[i]) <
> + pdo_min_voltage(pdo[i - 1])) {
> + tcpm_log_force(port,
> + " err: Variable supply pdos should be in increasing order, pdo index:%u"
> + , i);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + break;
> + default:
> + tcpm_log_force(port, " Unknown pdo type");
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * PD (data, control) command handling functions
> */
> @@ -1308,6 +1376,9 @@ static void tcpm_pd_data_request(struct tcpm_port *port,
>
> tcpm_log_source_caps(port);
>
> + tcpm_validate_caps(port, port->source_caps,
> + port->nr_source_caps);
It's strange that this isn't checked. We just want to print errors?
Can this ever be true here because it feels like we won't load if it's
invalid. Is this really the right place to check?
> +
> /*
> * This message may be received even if VBUS is not
> * present. This is quite unexpected; see USB PD
> @@ -3475,9 +3546,13 @@ static int tcpm_copy_vdos(u32 *dest_vdo, const u32 *src_vdo,
> return nr_vdo;
> }
>
> -void tcpm_update_source_capabilities(struct tcpm_port *port, const u32 *pdo,
> - unsigned int nr_pdo)
> +int tcpm_update_source_capabilities(struct tcpm_port *port, const u32 *pdo,
> + unsigned int nr_pdo)
> {
> + if (tcpm_validate_caps(port, pdo, nr_pdo)) {
> + tcpm_log_force(port, "Invalid source caps");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> mutex_lock(&port->lock);
> port->nr_src_pdo = tcpm_copy_pdos(port->src_pdo, pdo, nr_pdo);
> switch (port->state) {
> @@ -3497,16 +3572,21 @@ void tcpm_update_source_capabilities(struct tcpm_port *port, const u32 *pdo,
> break;
> }
> mutex_unlock(&port->lock);
> + return 0;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tcpm_update_source_capabilities);
>
> -void tcpm_update_sink_capabilities(struct tcpm_port *port, const u32 *pdo,
> - unsigned int nr_pdo,
> - unsigned int max_snk_mv,
> - unsigned int max_snk_ma,
> - unsigned int max_snk_mw,
> - unsigned int operating_snk_mw)
> +int tcpm_update_sink_capabilities(struct tcpm_port *port, const u32 *pdo,
> + unsigned int nr_pdo,
> + unsigned int max_snk_mv,
> + unsigned int max_snk_ma,
> + unsigned int max_snk_mw,
> + unsigned int operating_snk_mw)
> {
> + if (tcpm_validate_caps(port, pdo, nr_pdo)) {
> + tcpm_log_force(port, "Invalid source caps");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> mutex_lock(&port->lock);
> port->nr_snk_pdo = tcpm_copy_pdos(port->snk_pdo, pdo, nr_pdo);
> port->max_snk_mv = max_snk_mv;
> @@ -3525,6 +3605,7 @@ void tcpm_update_sink_capabilities(struct tcpm_port *port, const u32 *pdo,
> break;
> }
> mutex_unlock(&port->lock);
> + return 0;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tcpm_update_sink_capabilities);
>
> @@ -3560,7 +3641,16 @@ struct tcpm_port *tcpm_register_port(struct device *dev, struct tcpc_dev *tcpc)
>
> init_completion(&port->tx_complete);
> init_completion(&port->swap_complete);
> + tcpm_debugfs_init(port);
Why are we moving debugfs init for this patch? I'm too lazy to figure
out how this relates to the patch. :/
>
> + if (tcpm_validate_caps(port, tcpc->config->src_pdo,
> + tcpc->config->nr_src_pdo) ||
> + tcpm_validate_caps(port,
> + tcpc->config->snk_pdo,
> + tcpc->config->nr_snk_pdo)) {
This is indented too far. It should be:
if (tcpm_validate_caps(port, tcpc->config->src_pdo,
tcpc->config->nr_src_pdo) ||
tcpm_validate_caps(port, tcpc->config->snk_pdo,
tcpc->config->nr_snk_pdo)) {
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + goto out_destroy_wq;
> + }
> port->nr_src_pdo = tcpm_copy_pdos(port->src_pdo, tcpc->config->src_pdo,
> tcpc->config->nr_src_pdo);
> port->nr_snk_pdo = tcpm_copy_pdos(port->snk_pdo, tcpc->config->snk_pdo,
> @@ -3620,7 +3710,6 @@ struct tcpm_port *tcpm_register_port(struct device *dev, struct tcpc_dev *tcpc)
> }
> }
>
> - tcpm_debugfs_init(port);
> mutex_lock(&port->lock);
> tcpm_init(port);
> mutex_unlock(&port->lock);
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists