[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170908131838.564794932@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2017 15:19:32 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Avinash Patil <patila@...vell.com>,
Xinming Hu <huxm@...vell.com>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Ganapathi Bhat <gbhat@...vell.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 23/32] mwifiex: correct channel stat buffer overflows
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
commit 4b5dde2d6234ff5bc68e97e6901d1f2a0a7f3749 upstream.
mwifiex records information about various channels as it receives scan
information. It does this by appending to a buffer that was sized
to the max number of supported channels on any band, but there are
numerous problems:
(a) scans can return info from more than one band (e.g., both 2.4 and 5
GHz), so the determined "max" is not large enough
(b) some firmware appears to return multiple results for a given
channel, so the max *really* isn't large enough
(c) there is no bounds checking when stashing these stats, so problems
(a) and (b) can easily lead to buffer overflows
Let's patch this by setting a slightly-more-correct max (that accounts
for a combination of both 2.4G and 5G bands) and adding a bounds check
when writing to our statistics buffer.
Due to problem (b), we still might not properly report all known survey
information (e.g., with "iw <dev> survey dump"), since duplicate results
(or otherwise "larger than expected" results) will cause some
truncation. But that's a problem for a future bugfix.
(And because of this known deficiency, only log the excess at the WARN
level, since that isn't visible by default in this driver and would
otherwise be a bit too noisy.)
Fixes: bf35443314ac ("mwifiex: channel statistics support for mwifiex")
Cc: Avinash Patil <patila@...vell.com>
Cc: Xinming Hu <huxm@...vell.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Ganapathi Bhat <gbhat@...vell.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cfg80211.c | 2 +-
drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/scan.c | 6 ++++++
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cfg80211.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cfg80211.c
@@ -4188,7 +4188,7 @@ int mwifiex_init_channel_scan_gap(struct
if (adapter->config_bands & BAND_A)
n_channels_a = mwifiex_band_5ghz.n_channels;
- adapter->num_in_chan_stats = max_t(u32, n_channels_bg, n_channels_a);
+ adapter->num_in_chan_stats = n_channels_bg + n_channels_a;
adapter->chan_stats = vmalloc(sizeof(*adapter->chan_stats) *
adapter->num_in_chan_stats);
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/scan.c
@@ -2479,6 +2479,12 @@ mwifiex_update_chan_statistics(struct mw
sizeof(struct mwifiex_chan_stats);
for (i = 0 ; i < num_chan; i++) {
+ if (adapter->survey_idx >= adapter->num_in_chan_stats) {
+ mwifiex_dbg(adapter, WARN,
+ "FW reported too many channel results (max %d)\n",
+ adapter->num_in_chan_stats);
+ return;
+ }
chan_stats.chan_num = fw_chan_stats->chan_num;
chan_stats.bandcfg = fw_chan_stats->bandcfg;
chan_stats.flags = fw_chan_stats->flags;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists