[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170908150235.2931-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2017 16:02:35 +0100
From: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] can: check for null sk before deferencing it via the call to sock_net
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
The assignment of net via call sock_net will dereference sk. This
is performed before a sanity null check on sk, so there could be
a potential null dereference on the sock_net call if sk is null.
Fix this by assigning net after the sk null check. Also replace
the sk == NULL with the more usual !sk idiom.
Detected by CoverityScan CID#1431862 ("Dereference before null check")
Fixes: 384317ef4187 ("can: network namespace support for CAN_BCM protocol")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
---
net/can/bcm.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/can/bcm.c b/net/can/bcm.c
index 47a8748d953a..a3791674b8ce 100644
--- a/net/can/bcm.c
+++ b/net/can/bcm.c
@@ -1493,13 +1493,14 @@ static int bcm_init(struct sock *sk)
static int bcm_release(struct socket *sock)
{
struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
- struct net *net = sock_net(sk);
+ struct net *net;
struct bcm_sock *bo;
struct bcm_op *op, *next;
- if (sk == NULL)
+ if (!sk)
return 0;
+ net = sock_net(sk);
bo = bcm_sk(sk);
/* remove bcm_ops, timer, rx_unregister(), etc. */
--
2.14.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists